Rate your current LSP arsenal

I really don't like rating waxes since I feel my opinions change from car to car, but I give it a shot.



NXT 2.0 - 8.5/10 (great OTC that easy to use, great depth and gloss)

M26 - 8.5/10 (another great OTC that's very easy to use and looks great)

WG DGPS 3.0 - 9/10 (one of my favorite sealants, easy to use, looks great, super slick feel)

Fuzion - 8/10 (looks great, easy to use, lacks that super slick feeling of DGPS)

Zaino Z2/Z5 - 7/10 (Looks good, great durability, poor ease of use)

Dodo SN 7/10 (Looks awesome IMO, but have been having issues with sweating, expensive...still undecided on this wax)

P21S - 8/10 (great easy to use nuba, wish price was a little lower)

M16 - 8.5/10 (haven't used this a lot yet, but one of the best looking nuba's I have, would be a 9 if it were easier to remove)

M21 - 8/10

Black Magic - 4/10 (Tried this wax because of Consumer Reports...total PITA to remove!!! Would have scored much higher if that had not been the case)

KAIO/KSG waiting to be tested





I'd also like to add that durability means very little to me for my own personal cars....though I do like to have sealants for my customer cars.





Rasky
 
User Name said:
WW,



I highlighted 4 of your choices which are interesting too me. "Hyped" products generally turn me off but you are now one of two people I trust with this stuff to pump Z2. I may be forced into trying it but just for the record, even if I think it is the most amazing stuff ever, I'm not turning into a Zaino nutbag!



Supernatural - Yet another!



Duragloss - You give it a 10/10 and give us NO explanation??? I went to Napa today to get some and they don't carry it in igloo-land.



D151 - I have another thread going regarding D151 a white civic and 476s, maybe you can chime in on your thoughts.



Duragloss 501 is great because of the amount of cleaning it does. I recently washed a customer's gold Camry. I then clayed it. The finish felt smooth and appeared very clean. I then hit the car with the PC, a 5.5" LC white pad and DG501. You would not believe the amound of gunk it was pulling out of the paint. When I was done, the depth to that gold car was amazing. DG501 is also very inexpensive, and a little goes a long ways. In NC, we get about 4 months protection out of it. If I had to criticize it at all, I would say it doesn't have a lot of cut.



Regarding Zaino Z2 and Z5...i was a lot like you at one point. I didn't want to give in and buy the Zaino products...I thought they just couldn't be as great as people claimed. Well, I bought them, and have been VERY impressed. The main key with Zaino is the prep. In my opinion, you need to do 1 of 3 things before applying Z2 or Z5 in order to maximize durability:



1 - do an alcohol wipe down after polishing to remove any oils from the polish



2 - after polishing with something like Meguiar's or Menzerna (or whatever), apply ZAIO with the PC. This will serve as your finishing polish, remove oils from the previous polish, and serve as a great base to the Z2 or Z5.



3 - use Zaino PC as your finishing polish. It's a pretty good polish to use with the PC, and does a great job prepping the finish for Z2 or Z5.



Let me just say that on my Honda Element and Mitsubishi Lancer, I use Zaino. On my old Hyundai, I use Collinite and OCW, because I am no longer going to polish it, and want some filling. For my old 1973 VW, I use Souveran (since it's garaged and only driven to shows and cruise ins).
 
weekendwarrior said:
Regarding Zaino Z2 and Z5...i was a lot like you at one point. I didn't want to give in and buy the Zaino products...I thought they just couldn't be as great as people claimed. Well, I bought them, and have been VERY impressed. The main key with Zaino is the prep.



My thoughts exactly! I really like Zaino ALOT (Sal is a great guy to speak to).
 
Menzerna FMJ - 9.5/10 - This is still my go-to wax/sealant for the past 3 years. It's very easy to use, and looks incredible (especially on metallics). Despite what others have said about it, I'm able to get 3-4 months of durability out of it on my daily driver.



P21S 100% - 7/10 - I'm a little disappointed in this one considering the rave reviews it's gotten from some pros. Application is easy, but I wasn't too impressed with the looks. Durability isn't very good, either, but that's to be expected since it's a carnauba.



Optimum Opti-Seal - 7.5/10 - Again, another disappointment for me. It looks okay, but application can be tricky, especially on metallic and lighter colored cars. Durability seems to be in the 1-2 month range for me on my daily driver.



Optimum Car Wax - 8.5/10 - I love this stuff, especially the newer formula. I think it looks just as good as Opti-Seal, and it's just as easy to apply (if not easier). I use it like a QD after washes, and it does a great job. Durability isn't that great either, but it's so easy to apply that it's a non-issue for me. It's my favorite spray wax by far.



Collinite 476S - 9/10 - I was blown away by this stuff the first time I used it. Its look is very underrated, and the durability of it is just incredible. If it were easier to use, I would have ranked it right up there with FMJ. You really have to apply this stuff thin and not let it dry too long, or else you'll have a hard time removing it. This is the only wax I use on my daily driver now (with a couple toppings of OCW once a month or so).



Four Star UPP - 8.5/10 - This stuff reminds me of FMJ a lot. It's extremely easy to apply, and leaves a very slick surface behind. It looks great, too. The only gripe I have with it is its durability. I can't seem to get more than a month out of this stuff.
 
For the sake of consistancy i should add a few things, i have SN (as per the 3 CnB's i did with it) i certantly found it to last longer then some of the people have commented. Different climates accounts for something etc.



Having used it a fair bit i will say this; it can look sealantly and flat. It can also look wet and deep, i think paintwork colour and prep before hand count alot. RMG, PPCL and Yellow Moose seem to really enhance it on colours like blue where in honesty, i have found it flat.



Back in the day i was big Zaino fan, nothing to knock the product now. I honestly feel that unless you are going ZFX it you it wont last longer then Wolfgang 3.0.



Wolfgang 3.0 Seems generally warmer though they look similar. Applying CG EZ GLAZE, RMG and PPCL before the WG 3.0 do seem to make for some intreasting differences/improvements which you cant do with Zaino.



Geoff
 
I think one of the most interesting things about this thread is that one man's 4 is another man's 9. Go figure.



I think that speaks to the subjectivity of it all. Even durability, which I thought was more of an objective factor might have subjective elements to it, which influence outcome.



There are just so many variable which might influence the look of an LSP it is amazing. I wonder how great a factor climate plays in the look of an LSP? Would Souveran look the same in the Florida heat and humidity as opposed to a cool spring day in Toronto? How about polish? If you polish with X and I with Y, will that impact the final look of a given product.



Couple of things I'll probably take from this thread...



1. I'm going to have to buckle and try Zaino. Z2, ZFX & ZAIO for certain (plus a few other Z's, I just can't remember them now).



2. Wolfgang 3.0 gets praise almost across the board? It'll be here soon!



3. Duragloss seems to give a pretty good bang for your buck. I tried to buy it on Wednesday, but Napa doesn't carry it in igloo-land.
 
My ratings really come down more to ease of use and cost. I find the look of all of them to be very close, and durability is not really even a factor when you wax as often as I do. :D
 
My ratings are based on durability, ease of use (can it be applied in the sun, big factor when not in a garage), and how easy is it to wipe off. I am sure that the Pros have a different criteria than me.
 
User Name said:
Dude,



Are you like the Victoria Wax police?



I gave my opinion, which I qualified as "a hack" and I think your product stinks. Why do you feel the need to defend it, I'm one tiny fish in a HUGE pond. Get over it. I'm a lawyer, not a detailer and I think you make crappy wax and if you think stalking my opinion on the internet is going to change that, then you're going to end up with a post like this where people will read me write that your wax is priced about $76 too much and I think I saw it for 75 bucks! Not many at Autopia take me seriously, but now that you've stalked me on forum number two, not too many are going to take you seriously either.



Is that response better?



Dear User Name or 3Fitty or whatever you call yourself on different forums! IIRC, focused personal attacks like this are not tolerated on any kind of forums. Similarly, this language is inappropriate in a forum, so COULD YOU PLEASE SHUT YOUR TINY LITTLE, FRAYED, STRETCHMARKED MOUTH???



Mr. David Wyllie (aka Dude!) is the manufacturer of Victoria Wax himself. Not the VW police... balee dat! Imagine that he would like you to send back the product because he just wants 100% customer satisfaction!!!



And nooo; you start to bash a fine product, because you left it to set for an hour and it was hard to remove... WOW, what a surprise!!!



The fact that you think that he is trying to stalk you, tells everything about you.



Members of Autopia! This guy on Meguiar's online started a wax test and he struggled with 2 paste waxes (476 & Victoria Concours). He started to shovel $hit, trying to find every imaginable opportunity to bash either the 476, the Concours or David Wyllie. He tried to save himself with worthless, pitiful excuses, that "he just wanted to wax a car" and like here, "I'm just a hack", hiding behind smart sentences like „sarcasm is my weapon�, etc.



Having extensive knowledge in fine carnauba waxes, I tried to explain to this guy how these waxes work:



Bence said:
Wow, I almost missed this.



3Fitty, I think that even a weekend warrior has the potential to learn, gather experience. The comments you've made on 2 extremely high quality paste waxes show that this unfortunatley not always the case. In your case I hope it's not just the result of a closed mind, just a lack of overall experience with waxes - especially with different application/removal characteristics.



Your presence on this forum shows that you are ready to raise your niveau.



So, let's talk about the Collinite 476 and the Victoria Concours a bit (basic lingo). The 476 is a synthetic/carnauba blend formulated to give a very stable film which lasts a very long time, gives absolutely superior beading and excellent physical protection. The traditional Collinite appearance is bright, reflective. They can look wetter with polishes that contain wax such as 1Z. However it is an industrial product, hence it has a few quirky characteristics for the novice detailer. It is highly sensitive to a thin layer, to certain outside conditions, and most importantly, removal time. It is best to apply to 1-3 panels before removal (technique/time dependent). It should come off easily, although not dusting-easily. The resulting surface is slick, and has good optics; and usually the latter gains a bit after the first wash. In some regards it is similar to the next product:



Victoria Concours. It is one of the most sophisticated pure beauty waxes out there. As you may know, there are a few companies in our little world, who offer bare hand applied carnauba waxes. VW is such a company. Victoria waxes are formulated with cosmetic grade ingredients (where possible), therefore a bare hand application will not stress your body as other similar products can with more synthetic components. Remember, our skin is more porous than you'd think, so the absorption factor definitely plays a role here. So it contains carnauba wax (#1), fine oils and a friendly solvent. You won't find any kind of silicones in it.



As with any hand applied carnauba, you take a bit out of the jar, soften it by rubbing it between your palms and then massage it onto the surface. Spread as thin as possible. If you feel that your hands start to become grabby, just rub your palms together again and your skin will release a bit more wax. Bare hand appication is not a quick process for the inexperienced, but a very nice tactile impression. You'll find details on your vehicle that went unnoticed until that day. However, it's not for the "quickly slap on a coat" mentality. This process is a relaxing, sensual one BUT NOT A MUST. It is rather a style, a ceremony. You can apply the Concours with an applicator too and you will end up using a bit less wax.



Now comes the most important thing. Concours has a short setting time! That means if you are initially clumsy and slow, you can start to remove the wax from the given PANEL as soon as you finished it. The "recommended" setting time of Concours is somewhere between 1-5 minutes, but this is really depends on the outside conditions (application temps, humidity, etc.). Generally, 2-3 minutes is totally sufficient. That means: apply it to one panel at a time. If you are slow with the bare hand application, apply it to just ones section at a time. If you are quick with an applicator, wax 2-3 panels before starting to wipe off the first. If Concours dries onto the surface, you'll need a belt sander to get it off. But seriously, it is almost impossible to remove. It is not a flaw, it's the CHARACTERISTICS of Concours. The solvent flashes off and the remaining wax film is dry and stubborn. However, when you made this serious mistake, just reintroduce the solvent to the dried wax film (wax over the residue) and the wax will be easily removable.



For removal, take a short nap microfiber or plush cotton towel, and slowly remove the wax. As with other highly concentrated *pure* carnaubas, it may sweat a bit after a couple of hours, but you can knock these marks down with a spritz & wipe with a QD (preferably VW QD, as it is a truly excellent QD). After setting, the wax should come off easily and the resulting surface has a characteristic heavily smooth feel, not snotty slick like synthetics. For best results (complete coverage/aesthetics/durability/protection) always keep 3 layers on the car. 2 layers give complete coverage, 3 has the best appearance with a bright, very reflective finish, excellent depth and color rendition. Going over 3 layers is pointless.



VW Concours is an honest looking wax, which doesn't alter the true shade of the color. If you want additional slickness, just use the VW QD. It is surprisingly durable, especially it is considered as a *beauty wax*. Alternatively you can try the Collectors too which is a bit oilier than Concours, easier to remove but its appearance is very similar. I kept nice layers of the original Cruising on my car. It was an acrylic-enhanced Victoria wax (discontinued). It absolutely rivaled #16 in every conceivable ways in comparable conditions (half car VWCru, half #16 in Hungary) but looked nicer - however this is subjective.



Sooo, if you understand these characteristics of certain *heavy* paste waxes, you might discover their therapeutic application/removal processes and you'll like them more.





To get the whole picture, please read here David Wyllie’s responses too and if you can find anything wrong with his style, language, politeness, please indicate where: The Great 9 Wax Shoot Out! - Car Care Forums: Meguiar's Online

Remember, David is an honest, old-fashioned, true entrepreneur, and the forum members KNOW THIS. We don’t need a rapscallion, a nobody to flame a civilized discussion.



User Name/3Fitty/Balee Dat/Best Lawyer thought that it is worth to go into bash & attack mode again reacting the following way:



3Fitty said:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bence

3Fitty, I think that even a weekend warrior has the potential to learn, gather experience.



I agree. That is why I did the test; to satisfy my personal curiosity and share my findings.



Quote:

The comments you've made on 2 extremely high quality paste waxes show that this unfortunatley not always the case.



Or, simply that they do not work well. :chuckle:



Quote:

In your case I hope it's not just the result of a closed mind



Could be, except that I praised certain waxes where it was warranted. Frankly, if VW was that "magic wax" that made my car into a Gallardo and lasted for 2 years, I assure you, I would have told you. ;)



Quote:

just a lack of overall experience with waxes



Well, this is where I think you really could be right but your conclusion would still ultimately be wrong. I'm not a pro, far from it, but I'd be willing to bet the majority of "enthusiasts" who have read this thread, have more in common with me (ie: the weekend warrior) than with a pro, or those to claim to have a chemical engineering degree in automotive wax.



Quote:

- especially with different application/removal characteristics.



See, if you read the beginning of this thread you would have come across a quote where I said "dude, I just want to wax my car". What I love about the 5 step approach is its simplicity. But if Meg's started telling me that I couldn't mix polymer A with life force B, I just take the bus and sell my car. :think:



Quote:

Your presence on this forum shows that you are ready to raise your niveau.



One of my law professors once said, "never trust a lawyer who uses latin phrases"... as such, your use of the word "niveau" has caused me great anxiety and I'm going to have to read the rest of your post with a skeptical eye! :chuckle:



Quote:

So, let's talk about the Collinite 476 and the Victoria Concours a bit (basic lingo). The 476 is a synthetic/carnauba blend formulated to give a very stable film which lasts a very long time, gives absolutely superior beading and excellent physical protection. The traditional Collinite appearance is bright, reflective. They can look wetter with polishes that contain wax such as 1Z. However it is an industrial product, hence it has a few quirky characteristics for the novice detailer. It is highly sensitive to a thin layer, to certain outside conditions, and most importantly, removal time. It is best to apply to 1-3 panels before removal (technique/time dependent). It should come off easily, although not dusting-easily. The resulting surface is slick, and has good optics; and usually the latter gains a bit after the first wash. In some regards it is similar to the next product:



I don't know if what you wrote above is true and I would only fully believe it to be true if you had some scientific data to prove it, but having said that, if it is true, Collinite 476s should have a label on it that says "not for dummies like 3Fitty".



Quote:

Victoria Concours. It is one of the most sophisticated pure beauty waxes out there.



I found this line very amusing. VC is "sophisticated", "pure" and "beautiful", heck if I didn't know better, I'd want to date her!



Quote:

As you may know, there are a few companies in our little world, who offer bare hand applied carnauba waxes. VW is such a company.

Yes, yes... I know. The infomercials about the rocket chef told me I was going to be a whiz in the kitchen as well. Turns out I couldn't even properly chop an onion.



My point is this... who cares about bare handed wax application? Do you have any data which shows it is better or offers some advantages over conventional application methods. One of my sisters would put pigeon droppings on her face if you told her it would reduce wrinkles. Some people will try anything.



Quote:

Victoria waxes are formulated with cosmetic grade ingredients



Dude, I've got a wife to slap lipstick on, I don't need lipstick for my car. ;)



Quote:

therefore a bare hand application will not stress your body as other similar products can with more synthetic components. Remember, our skin is more porous than you'd think, so the absorption factor definitely plays a role here. So it contains carnauba wax (#1), fine oils and a friendly solvent. You won't find any kind of silicones in it.



No quite sure of your point hear, but I appreciate the concern for my supple and soft hands. :chuckle:



Quote:

As with any hand applied carnauba, you take a bit out of the jar, soften it by rubbing it between your palms and then massage it onto the surface. Spread as thin as possible. If you feel that your hands start to become grabby, just rub your palms together again and your skin will release a bit more wax. Bare hand appication is not a quick process for the inexperienced, but a very nice tactile impression. You'll find details on your vehicle that went unnoticed until that day. However, it's not for the "quickly slap on a coat" mentality. This process is a relaxing, sensual one BUT NOT A MUST. It is rather a style, a ceremony. You can apply the Concours with an applicator too and you will end up using a bit less wax.



Okay, I am going to do this 100%, just not to my car! Any time a married man wants to get "relaxing and sensual" I think it should be with his wife (or girlfriend - if he can afford one).



Quote:

Now comes the most important thing. Concours has a short setting time! That means if you are initially clumsy and slow, you can start to remove the wax from the given PANEL as soon as you finished it. The "recommended" setting time of Concours is somewhere between 1-5 minutes, but this is really depends on the outside conditions (application temps, humidity, etc.). Generally, 2-3 minutes is totally sufficient. That means: apply it to one panel at a time. If you are slow with the bare hand application, apply it to just ones section at a time. If you are quick with an applicator, wax 2-3 panels before starting to wipe off the first. If Concours dries onto the surface, you'll need a belt sander to get it off. But seriously, it is almost impossible to remove. It is not a flaw, it's the CHARACTERISTICS of Concours. The solvent flashes off and the remaining wax film is dry and stubborn. However, when you made this serious mistake, just reintroduce the solvent to the dried wax film (wax over the residue) and the wax will be easily removable.



Well, I certainly didn't do this.



Quote:

After setting, the wax should come off easily and the resulting surface has a characteristic heavily smooth feel, not snotty slick like synthetics. For best results (complete coverage/aesthetics/durability/protection) always keep 3 layers on the car. 2 layers give complete coverage, 3 has the best appearance with a bright, very reflective finish, excellent depth and color rendition. Going over 3 layers is pointless.



Sorry and I really hate to ask this, but do you have an scientific date which supports these rather bold claims?



Quote:

VW Concours is an honest looking wax, which doesn't alter the true shade of the color.



Now I'm a bit confused. What do you mean by "alter the shade". I thought clear coats were "clear" and you aren't really even touching paint, no? Also, if by altering the true shade you mean "not making it look bad", well, isn't that kind of the point?



Quote:

however this is subjective.



Isn't the whole "looks part" of waxing "subjective"?





"Dude", according to your principles, this weapon is a true POS and defective too, right?



yrdiw.jpg






I answered him in a similar way, but unfortunately, my post was almost immediately deleted by the mods of MOL.



Bence said:
3 Fitty, okay, if you want to dissect something… Let’s do a nice and friendly vivisection.



(Disclaimer to the other forum members: Please be mindful that in order to communicate with 3Fitty effectively, I have to use a common signal and language system he readily understands. Forgive me as this system might be too simplistic and generalized at times. Otherwise, essential sense of humor needed.)



Quote:

The comments you've made on 2 extremely high quality paste waxes show that this unfortunatley not always the case.


Or, simply that they do not work well. :chuckle:



If you don’t know that pantyhoses are designed to be pulled off before/during an intercourse, you won’t be successful in making your spouse happy. Belonging to the minority, results in such comments like the above.



Quote:

In your case I hope it's not just the result of a closed mind


Could be, except that I praised certain waxes where it was warranted. Frankly, if VW was that "magic wax" that made my car into a Gallardo and lasted for 2 years, I assure you, I would have told you. ;)



Thank you, but I think I can live without your assessment, because 1.) It doesn’t have the in-depth insight I require to my standards of product testing. 2.) I do not find the importance of your opinion significant enough to be a factor in this regard.

Writing such bright and highly educated sentences like I read in your (and other similarly intellectual members’) contributions, must be a challenge indeed – but they lack both professional and entertaining values. I somehow don’t recall where I stated the �magic wax� portion you are referring to, but I must confess, I’m impressed by the invention of this theta-wave mental state-inspired miraculous process. But you didn’t write a single letter about the �afterparty�. Should your Lexus revert back from the Gallardo state into the humble IS again after the mentioned 2 years, or is it only the gloss that will go away in that timeframe?

Stating that �where it was warranted� makes you sound as a qualified evaluator, yet you described your obvious struggle to master certain paste waxes. Believe it or not, there are people, who want to help in this case. But I admit, it must be an almost physically painful experience to become aware of the fact that the Universe is not 3Fitty-centered and has definitely more than 1 dimension.




Quote:

just a lack of overall experience with waxes


Well, this is where I think you really could be right but your conclusion would still ultimately be wrong. I'm not a pro, far from it, but I'd be willing to bet the majority of "enthusiasts" who have read this thread, have more in common with me (ie: the weekend warrior) than with a pro, or those to claim to have a chemical engineering degree in automotive wax.



Chemical engineering degree is not needed, but it is always useful to ask some basic questions about the general use of a certain product. Enthusiasts (you) can click on brand-independent specialized forums, direct your questions towards the manufacturer of this wax, so you have plenty of choices. But this �I saw someone who have heard about it and it’s BS�, �yesyes, I agree� type of mentality is a tangible evidence of a limited mind. A classic case of the blind lead the blind.

In your specific case, labels were missing, application went wrong, and you have found the wax to be subpar. Is this the fault of the wax? Isn’t the wax only the passive portion of the process? I think as we have the (theoretical) intelligence to act like a dominant race (?) of this planet (aka, the active part of the wax vs. application), this topic doesn’t need further discussion.




Quote:

- especially with different application/removal characteristics.


See, if you read the beginning of this thread you would have come across a quote where I said "dude, I just want to wax my car". What I love about the 5 step approach is its simplicity. But if Meg's started telling me that I couldn't mix polymer A with life force B, I just take the bus and sell my car. :think:



If you want to jump out of your IS and hop into a prev-gen BMW 760 because you �just want to drive that car�, you won’t be able to do that because it has its shifter on the column, and if you try to put it in D, looking for the shifter on the console, you will be unable to do it – because BMW is DIFFERENT. Driving a Ford Model T is not like driving a modern car, even though there are three pedals on the floor. iDrive won’t be the same as Remote Touch of Lexus either.

And for example you can not establish a stable sealant film over a pure wax because the oils hinder the chemical bonding of the synthetic on the substrate. And there are plenty of two-component sealants and coatings (base liquids and/or emulsions with activators/curing accelerators), where you SHOULD mix Poly-A with LF-B, so prepare to broaden your horizons. But hey, they work DIFFERENTLY too!





Quote:

Your presence on this forum shows that you are ready to raise your niveau.


One of my law professors once said, "never trust a lawyer who uses latin phrases"... as such, your use of the word "niveau" has caused me great anxiety and I'm going to have to read the rest of your post with a skeptical eye!



Don’t fret (anxiety disorders are curable), my law professors would agree with yours… As the word â€�niveauâ€� was French influenced in this context, meaning level, grade, stage or standard, I let you decide if it fits. Members of MOL, watch out! 3Fitty will get a panic attack when he hears words like „â€�coupéâ€� or „â€�voilàâ€�, so use your writing skills wisely!

I think international literacy (not in the Dubya way) can bring a certain color into any written or spoken sentence, but forgive me if it was hard to capture the essence of my intentions, as English is only my third language after Hungarian (my mother tongue) and German. Wanna do a similar discourse in Hungarian?




Quote:

So, let's talk about the Collinite 476 and the Victoria Concours a bit (basic lingo). The 476 is a synthetic/carnauba blend formulated to give a very stable film which lasts a very long time, gives absolutely superior beading and excellent physical protection. The traditional Collinite appearance is bright, reflective. They can look wetter with polishes that contain wax such as 1Z. However it is an industrial product, hence it has a few quirky characteristics for the novice detailer. It is highly sensitive to a thin layer, to certain outside conditions, and most importantly, removal time. It is best to apply to 1-3 panels before removal (technique/time dependent). It should come off easily, although not dusting-easily. The resulting surface is slick, and has good optics; and usually the latter gains a bit after the first wash. In some regards it is similar to the next product:


I don't know if what you wrote above is true and I would only fully believe it to be true if you had some scientific data to prove it, but having said that, if it is true, Collinite 476s should have a label on it that says "not for dummies like 3Fitty".



So you refuse buying salt until someone proves you with scietific data that it has a very characteristic, recognizable taste? Collinite states that �remove the wax before it dries�. This particular wax WORKS THIS WAY. I think it is a relatively easy sentence to catch – at least bits of its meaning – even for entities with lower levels of intellect. Scientific data is therefore not necessary. You just have to use the products as they were originally intended – even dummies can grow up to the task. But if you need scientific data, take a glossmeter, a topography meter, a protractor and you can start measuring the contact angles of the beads, the objective gloss levels, make comparisons on different substrates, examine possible bonding issues, etc.



Quote:

Victoria Concours. It is one of the most sophisticated pure beauty waxes out there.


I found this line very amusing. VC is "sophisticated", "pure" and "beautiful", heck if I didn't know better, I'd want to date her!



In waxmaking, the word �sophisticated� means that the given product has unique, mainly natural ingredients, it is handcrafted in small quantities, and it is not a volume product poured on soulless automated lines. �Purity� means there are no man-made, aka synthetic components in it – where practicable and/or technology allows it. A �beauty� wax is an LSP, focused on providing first and foremost optics, appearance with no emphasis on durability. Durability and physical protection is just a welcome plus. (I hope you don’t mind the clarification, before you start flooding the forum with highly intellectual, witty – and most importantly exceedingly original – comments again.)





Quote:

As you may know, there are a few companies in our little world, who offer bare hand applied carnauba waxes. VW is such a company.


Yes, yes... I know. The infomercials about the rocket chef told me I was going to be a whiz in the kitchen as well. Turns out I couldn't even properly chop an onion.

My point is this... who cares about bare handed wax application? Do you have any data which shows it is better or offers some advantages over conventional application methods. One of my sisters would put pigeon droppings on her face if you told her it would reduce wrinkles. Some people will try anything.




There are certain people among us who care about bare hand wax application, and they pay up to 45.000 USD for one pot of wax (Zymöl Solaris). And no, I’m not talking about the worthiness or worthlessness of these products; just about their existence and their significant presence on a highly specialized market. VW’s product performance is VERY similar to those ultra-expensive waxes for the fraction of their prices. THIS makes VW Concours a remarkable wax.

Bare hand applied waxes offer one significant advantage: they are different, and they represent a wonderfully ancient, yet efficient tactile experience and a unique methodology. Yes, SOME people try anything. Some people are gullible. But these factors are not mutually exclusive and bare hand waxing is definitely not intended for average people – just as accenting, spit-shining, or jeweling. I’m sure you are familiar with these terms. If you want to know more, visit detailingworld’s Showroom section to find painstakingly detailed (pun!) writeups.

BTW, Victoria Concours definitely smells better than a pigeon excrement treatment, or a failed onion-chop tournament.




Quote:

Victoria waxes are formulated with cosmetic grade ingredients


Dude, I've got a wife to slap lipstick on, I don't need lipstick for my car.



Point proven; as that was an extremely disrespectful comment towards the entire female society, so congrats �dude�.

Objectively, as Paul stated, the purity of the ingredients of Victoria waxes is excellent. In other words: there is nothing in the formulas that isn't already in lipstick, hair conditioner and skin creams.




Quote:

therefore a bare hand application will not stress your body as other similar products can with more synthetic components. Remember, our skin is more porous than you'd think, so the absorption factor definitely plays a role here. So it contains carnauba wax (#1), fine oils and a friendly solvent. You won't find any kind of silicones in it.


No quite sure of your point hear, but I appreciate the concern for my supple and soft hands.



You mean *here* don’t you? As Paul wrote, a pure wax formula can be applied with bare hands, because it doesn’t contain harmful ingredients, which can seep through the pores of the skin, causing a possible long term damage. Sorry to disappoint you but I’m quite uninterested in your ever so supple anything, and I’ll leave you alone in your strange monopolar Universe where you can carry on struggling for some merciful attention.



Quote:

As with any hand applied carnauba, you take a bit out of the jar, soften it by rubbing it between your palms and then massage it onto the surface. Spread as thin as possible. If you feel that your hands start to become grabby, just rub your palms together again and your skin will release a bit more wax. Bare hand appication is not a quick process for the inexperienced, but a very nice tactile impression. You'll find details on your vehicle that went unnoticed until that day. However, it's not for the "quickly slap on a coat" mentality. This process is a relaxing, sensual one BUT NOT A MUST. It is rather a style, a ceremony. You can apply the Concours with an applicator too and you will end up using a bit less wax.


Okay, I am going to do this 100%, just not to my car! Any time a married man wants to get "relaxing and sensual" I think it should be with his wife (or girlfriend – if he can afford one).



Save the wax for your car – she may become too shiny for your taste. Or seriously, you can try a different thing and do the same routine with a paste on your car.

�Affording� a companion (do you want slavery to return?) is not a difficult task for those folks who are regular customers of bare hand applied exclusive waxes.




Quote:

Now comes the most important thing. Concours has a short setting time! That means if you are initially clumsy and slow, you can start to remove the wax from the given PANEL as soon as you finished it. The "recommended" setting time of Concours is somewhere between 1-5 minutes, but this is really depends on the outside conditions (application temps, humidity, etc.). Generally, 2-3 minutes is totally sufficient. That means: apply it to one panel at a time. If you are slow with the bare hand application, apply it to just ones section at a time. If you are quick with an applicator, wax 2-3 panels before starting to wipe off the first. If Concours dries onto the surface, you'll need a belt sander to get it off. But seriously, it is almost impossible to remove. It is not a flaw, it's the CHARACTERISTICS of Concours. The solvent flashes off and the remaining wax film is dry and stubborn. However, when you made this serious mistake, just reintroduce the solvent to the dried wax film (wax over the residue) and the wax will be easily removable.


Well, I certainly didn't do this.



It was quite obvious seeing your assessment.



Quote:

After setting, the wax should come off easily and the resulting surface has a characteristic heavily smooth feel, not snotty slick like synthetics. For best results (complete coverage/aesthetics/durability/protection) always keep 3 layers on the car. 2 layers give complete coverage, 3 has the best appearance with a bright, very reflective finish, excellent depth and color rendition. Going over 3 layers is pointless.


Sorry and I really hate to ask this, but do you have an scientific date which supports these rather bold claims?



Do you really need �scientific data� to accept that 2 coats is the bare minimum for complete coverage because you can miss a few spots? Or going over 3 layers is basically pointless? Have you read about the law of diminishing returns? Or wax doesn’t bond chemically to the substrate the way as a synthetic does? Which statements are the boldest? That it produces a bright finish? Or it will come off EASILY???



Quote:

VW Concours is an honest looking wax, which doesn't alter the true shade of the color.


Now I'm a bit confused. What do you mean by "alter the shade". I thought clear coats were "clear" and you aren't really even touching paint, no? Also, if by altering the true shade you mean "not making it look bad", well, isn't that kind of the point?



No wonder you are confused. Some very basic information will help here too. So, just for your information, a �clearcoat� IS PAINT – except that it has no color/pigmentation. Yes, both, as a clearcoat can be tinted, so you have a colored clear which sufficiently transparent, yet it will bleed color onto the pad while polishing. So, you are touching paint. Altering the shade means in this context that certain waxes make the paint look darker (NXT, #21, see this thread: 2000 Honda Shadow Spirit 1100 - Car Care Forums: Meguiar's Online), while others make it look warmer (#26; hard to measure or qualify/quantify; this means a slight yellowish hue, but not yellowing the paint itself – similar to famous car painters, who use a cream colored base for a Ferrari red, because it makes the red more vibrant and definitely more positive than a gray filler, although you can’t see it directly.)

An honest looking LSP doesn’t alter the color, just emphasises the factory look in a very balanced, understated way. True color rendition without an artificial looking oily wetness is a key to this type of appearance – but this doesn’t mean that other types (excessively wet, warm, mirrorlike, bright, deep; rich just to quote the simpler terms) can’t or won’t look good. Besides, with a PERFECT prep, the visual differences are almost negligible.




Quote:

however this is subjective.


Isn't the whole "looks part" of waxing "subjective"?



Yes, it is. You hit the target with deadly precision.





An afterthought: I’m still surprised how people behave on message boards. Finger pointing, pissing contests, offending language and insults seem to be the norm. Five year old girls sit on a jet of a jacuzzi with more serious faces.



If you are the type of guy who just slaps lipstick on your wife or a coat o’wax on the car, why are you thinking that it is necessary and/or recommended to bombard us with your endlessly wise and mature comments? I could mention some of the above posters too who have similar levels of maturity in their shallow contributions. Yes, embarrassed, uneasy feelings can switch on the defensive mode, which then evolves into a goatlike laughter, an unsuccessful attempt to make a fool of us with ill-chosen words of nonexistent substance. I’m sure you react the same way when you hear a sommelier talking about a bottle of wine. Or do you seriously think that there are earth tones in the taste of the wine? Does he have scientific data to prove you that? Red fruits, a touch of smoke in the aroma? Serious BS, huh? Does the wine need to *rest* in a decanter? Is it a tired athlete? You may just slurp down an entire bottle without thinking too much about the ingenious little constituents, ingredients which determine the characteristics of a fine wine, I don’t know.

You have tried some waxes and reported YOUR PERCEIVED END RESULT. Be prepared that someone will politely disagree with you based on his/her more extensive knowledge. You’ve been corrected because your methodology was flawed – mind you, the intent of the correction was to teach you, because with those informations you can get better results with paste waxes.

Yes, you can repeat countless times that you just wanted to wax your car like Average Joe does, yet it only qualifies you to win the Golden Little Parrot Who Repeated A Broken Record Player award. After waxing your car in the Xth time, you are going to try other products or methods. A little practical, empirical knowledge will come handy.

I always think outside of the box. I apply waxes by hand, with a DA, with a rotary. I even apply QDs or spray waxes with rotary, just to see what they are capable of. Yes, I apply waxes using my bare hands. With applicators too. I also apply various coatings. And because I find that bare hand waxing is a relaxing experience, I classify it as therapeutic. The results are nice, the process is enjoyable, so there are unquestionable benefits for me and many purist waxophiles among us. We are the sommeliers of detailing.



You should stick with what works for you; I couldn’t care less.



Two little Hungarian proverbs to the end:

Amilyen az adjonisten, olyan a fogadjisten.

Akinek nem inge, ne vegye magára.






Coming back to a similar thread, this guy starts the same flame war again. In his last post Mike Phillips said that this is about wax. Heck, NO! This is about absurdly impolite human behavior, period.



An hour after my post was deleted, I got an email from Tim Lingor, aka 2hotford, the former Super Moderator of MOL:

„I just read your post and I thank you for standing up and speaking your mind. I just did the same thing in another thread in regards to rotary polisher use. I am not sure why so many people on the site are acting cocky and arrogant when their skills leave little to be desired! When I was the Super Moderator of the site, I would have jumped all over some the silly comments I am now seeing.

…



I see that they removed your post. I emailed the Mods and told them that they needed to understand that there was a valid reason for it. I also told them that you deserve a lot more respect than the way you were being treated in that thread!

…



thank you for attempting to bring back some formality and structure to a once great site.�



THAT was more than enough for me, from a highly respected man like Tim…



Now, here on Autopia, some of you know me well enough to see that I NEVER allow myself to be dragged into such discussions. But this time, I feel that the protection of Mr. David Wyllie and his products dictated me to do this.



I don’t intend this to be misinterpreted. But sometimes you all have to see the whole picture, both sides of the coin, my view, and User Name/3Fitty’s/BLinNY behavioral matrix.



Those of you who are using VW products or dealing with Mr. Wyllie can chime in to share your views.



Sorry for the threadjacking.
 
Yes, we all know Bence has an emotional attachment to Victoria Wax.



What is so wrong with having an opinion about a product? I guess if we dislike a product, we are not allowed to say anything? So, that means that we should delete all posts regarding the poor performance of the product.



3Fitty simply stated his opinion. If you don't like it, fine.





Bence, your post that was deleted was incredibly rude and full of crap. It was so horrible, that I saved it because I knew it would be deleted. You should be ashamed of your attitude.
 
Thanks for your post driver666.



In fact we are seeing these things differently. I think my "emotional attachment" is directed toward a man I respect, based on the way he does business and because he makes excellent products.



Regarding my rude and full of crap post, try to see it as a caricature, overemphasizing the original. (That's why you can find the so called disclaimer at the front.)



I don't care about his opinion of the product. But "dude-ing" someone who wants to ensure satisfaction, by providing great explanations is way off-target.



You are looking things on the surface only.



And no, I'm not ashamed.



BTW the Nissan GT-R is POS because it can't reach its claimed top speed in reverse... See?





In my limited ideal world it would have looked like this:



- OMG it's crap.

- You are using it wrong! Use this way!

- Oh thanks for the helpful hints!

- No prob!

- Wow, it works great!



Done.



Mind you, I'm still not talking about the given product's performance, or the opinion of the user, but the methodology.
 
Dunce,



1. I never read your post at MOL and I haven't read it here because I don't care to read at a level which requires me to stoop to barnyard vernacular.



2. I don't know you and now you but it appears that you and your Wyllie are up to no good. In fact, if you look at this thread, it has actually been quite useful and quite a good conversation, until you and your Wyllie hijacked.



3. Wyllie has 8 posts, all promoting his VC wax. Let me ask you, is he paying a sponsor fee to DavidB? If not, I've seen other such self promoters get the boot along with their minions.



4. Prior to giving my opinion on VC Wax, I prefaced it and qualified it with a pretty well known fact... at best, I'm a hack and I even admitted that I put it on wrong the first time. Was I hiding something? I'll let the members decide.



5. You obviously have a financial interest in the product, which illicits your reaction. I'm tempted to actually go through your post and make minced meat out of you as I know many members would enjoy a little hungarian goulash with their detailing discussion. I will however, take the high ground (something I rarely do) and leave it at this, Victoria Wax Red stinks. That is the unsolicited opinion of a hack, if that sinks the proverbial Victoria wax ship, it wasn't from my words, rather your product.



6. So, how's about you get off my Wyllie and go back to your stone hut. As a famous footballer once said "Jebem u usta, te jebem. U ta skrbava usta, picko jedan"! Send my regards to your daddy, big Wyllie! ;)
 
Old Yugo guy rulez huh?



Then I have financial interest with Megs, 1Z, Menzerna, Scholl Concepts, Optimum, Finish Kare, etc.



It seems your own weapons can be unpleasant...
 
RaskyR1 said:
My ratings really come down more to ease of use and cost. I find the look of all of them to be very close, and durability is not really even a factor when you wax as often as I do. :D

I agree. Some of us value looks over durability, or ease of use over slickness, etc... Personally, ease of use and looks are my top priority, with durability in a close second.
 
Well, I couldn't resist myself, I actually just read your post and here is what I think about it (and by relation, you).



You are a typical European elitist. You feel the need to tell us about all the languages you speak, your ability correct my spelling and your broad knowledge about all things detailing related.



You can't sit down and have a burger and fries with a Budweiser to wash it down, because you are going to tell me that you'd rather dine on Fois Gras and wine that smells like sweat socks.



Sorry "dude" but that gets no play with me. Your elitist BS, spell checking, languaging speaking don't mean a rats a$$ to me. I'd bet you put your pants on one leg at a time, the same way I do, along with every steak and potatoes dude like me.



Frankly, you can hand lube yourself up with Victoria Wax and frolic in the sunset, video tape it and post it on youtube, but the product will still stink, IMO! I think in this thread I said one or two lines about VW red and it was largely ignored because the substance of the thread is "what do you have in your current arsenal".



Maybe during your extensive Hungarian education, they left out that word, which meant you didn't understand the point of the entire thread.



I'm just thinking, maybe Big Wyllie shared my private message with you, over oysters last night and that has got your panties in a bunch! Stay tuned, I've got more for the two of you, okay girlfriend?
 
You know, I really don't like wax threads. Why? Because they always turn into opinion battles - "You're wrong because in my opinion...". In the end, I find them to be a good read, but normally pointless.



We each have our own opinions and I wish people would respect the opinions of others.



The point of the thread was to ask people what they thought of their protectants. It's helpful to those who are always looking to try something new or are seeking opinions on a product. But, I feel the goal has been tainted.





I will say it again, but I still believe that polishes have a much more profound effect on the paint.
 
It seems that User Name isn' t that tough after all. I got a nice PM from him. I'm sure he just wanted to protect other members by communicating privately...



User Name said:
Hey, by the time you were born, it was good that my people kicked your a$$es back to where you belong! Marauding murderers, rapists, imperialist swine!



Have you known you were gay your entire life, or is this a recent discovery?



Self discovery can be a wonderful thing, you know?



Listen, since we got off to a bad start, I thought I might help you out with a quick google search I did for you.



Hungary — Gay & Lesbian Friendly Lodging — Hungarian Link Directory



You can thank me later.
 
I was so confident you would post that PM, that I wanted it to be especially entertaining for the members.



Did you check out the forum link? Looks good, right?



-------------



Sorry that it got out of hand guys. My thought were as simple as seeing what waxes I could get a consensus on (to try). I think I got three for certain.



Frankly, I don't take my opinion too seriously on this stuff, but I suppose Dunce has an economic interest in Victoria Wax and anything said bad about it, results in fury.



I wonder what you'd do Duncy if a real pro here tried your product and came to the same conclusion. I bet you wouldn't have the stones to write what you've written, or maybe that's the point... if you make a big enough stink about it now, nobody will share the *true* opinions about your product.



That said, it's embarrassing you got this worked up over a wax. If I had 90% share in the company, I wouldn't have reacted like you.



Now, I've got a hockey game to get to.
 
Back
Top