The s65 is a sweet ride Jonathan for sure, glad you took the time to make it right.
I guess the important non factor involved in this thread is if the detailer actually cares what the majority thinks. Sure there are some threads that come to mind which raise a flag, well many actually. Some of us are here because we love what we do and want to share, I try to take video footage of everything lately and try to grab the sun in each photo, many of our work is done with defect intensifiers, as opposed to oily fillers. We all know what waxes have and polishes have a tendency to hide things for a period of time, and use your best judgement when viewing.
The only thing this thread is going to change is the number used when these phonies put their work on display. I for one don't really care to dig too deep into the matter, any true professional should have the right to feel a little uneasy to say the least while knowing there are some out there that claim to do the same type processed and grueling work we all know it takes to get a perfect finish. I am glad Grouse mentioned the aid of defect hiding potential in polishes, because I firmly believe that's the result at least a few members are getting, take a look at some pictures posted, some guys actually have pics posted of themselves displaying improper (hologram inducing) polishing techniques, I mean we all know what happens when we hold a rotary at a sharp angle not allowing the pad to lay flat on the surface (hack city) but there are a few polishes that make that type work if used properly(unproperly) look fantastic, just look at the afters.
So what's worse? A typical hack using bs methods and products unknowingly leaving nasty results, or a somewhat knowledgeable detailer that doesn't follow the natural laws of chemistry and product how to's and taking pics like it's best in class work being done?
It's a hell of a lot easier to feel for the unknowing hacks than it is the pretenders imo, at least we all know where they stand.