l33
New member
BillNorth said:But I find that I am getting different results from the vast majority of posters on the site.
Thats why i'm looking forward to it. What are you planning on prepping it with, or are you going to apply it alone?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BillNorth said:But I find that I am getting different results from the vast majority of posters on the site.
L33 said:Thats why i'm looking forward to it. What are you planning on prepping it with, or are you going to apply it alone?
BillNorth said:I don't mean to come off like a p#ick, or know-it-all. My reviews are just that, one opinion. But I find that I am getting different results from the vast majority of posters on the site. A little frustrating I guess. There was a time when my experiences were the same as the other forum members.
SilvaBimma said:Why would they create a kit that doesn't correctly?
groebuck said:no doubt about that - but so far in my testing with longevity (my roomate's truck) it's doing great. Alone it's costly but the kit is a great value since you get the FMJ plus three other products and MF's.
The lack of a QD in the kit is a little disheartening becuase they would be offering a complete end to end solution..
If I were a weekend or part-time amateur detailer I would definatley use the FMJ kit as a little goes a long way and you can get fantastic results by hand.
Well, what, exactly, do you expect? It's a relativley new product, and by all reports, it's easy to use, and looks good after initial application (my experience, as well). Durability is the big question, and since FMJ hasn't been on the market very long, and doesn't have a large user-base, the answer is mostly "I don't know." So yeah, about the only reviews here so far are mostly positive, and mostly talk about application, removal, and appearance. That's just the nature of the beast. New products tend to get more attention from forum threads, well, because they're new. That's normal. The reviews aren't always in-depth . . . also very normal, and expected; users haven't had enough experience with the product to provide anything more than a cursory "looks great, easy-to-use" type of review.Corey Bit Spank said:This thread reminds me of the BlackfireII, Wolfgang, and NXT threads.![]()