imported_truzoom
New member
MrLEXUS2u said:Well Mr Southpark fan, I didn't know there was a certain level of seniority I had to attain before I was able to state or make a point on this BB...
Seniority has nothing to do with anything I said previously. Foremost, your condescending attitude towards the members here is just rude, and you specifically said "phew it's tiring dumbing things down", which seems like you are assuming we are all pretty unintelligent/simple/uneducated, but hey if you figured that out then I guess we are all wrong.
MrLEXUS2u said:Mike I'll make my point in a little more detail for you, as a matter of fact I'll do it in an outline format so it's easy to follow:
1. you got people saying the ES is a fancy version of the Camry
2. they say this because of the many similarities between the 2 cars
3. apparently this seems to be a negative on this board
4. it's painfully obvious :hairpull that this is a common practice for auto mfg the reasons again being business and a little too over the heads of many posters here so i wont waste my time.
phew it's tiring dumbing things down.
^Was this really necessary? We're all adults here.
Then you made these assumptions:
1. so the concensus here is that it's bad, a very bad thing that auto mfg use the SAME parts, pieces - whatever on their various lines of autos.
As I pointed out previously, this is NOT what we think. It is far from the concensus.
2. therefore, if you're a detailer, you should then be using different product lines on different car makes right? after all it's bad when auto mfg use the same part on 3-4 different cars.
I can't even see how this association would be relevant. Platform sharing by automobile makers? Using different products on different cars? :think: And again, we never said it is bad when auto manufacturers use "the same part on 3-4 different cars."
3. if you're a professional auto detailer who thinks an auto mfg is cheating the public by using similar parts on various cars then it would only stand to reason that if that detailer uses the Meg line (for example) for all his/her details then that would by hypocritical right?
Same as above. I don't see what you are trying to prove here. Many professional detailers DO have a preference towards a single brand (e.g., Mike Phillips on MOL), but that is only personal preference or various other reasons not relating to be hypocritical about ideals on platform sharing.
4. so then you should (as a prof detailer with this mind set) be carrying at least 5-7 different product lines in each category (glazes, sealants, waxes, polishes, QDs ect) since you can't treat a honda accord the way you would a porsche.
First, many professional detailers here carry many, many brands of products, but it is very unlikely that they will treat one car better than the other in terms of treatment or products used. I've seen detailers here use Pinnacle Souveran (approx $60-$70 per 8oz) on average joe cars like Civics, while some detailers have used Optimum Car Wax($12.99 for 17 fl oz) on Porsches.
To make such generalizations about the members here and how they may be "hypocritical" in their methods because of their views on platform sharing is something I find to be offensive. And who are you to "[challenge me] to think and use [my] brain"? The last time I checked this was a discussion forum, not "Detailing Lessons by Professor MrLEXUS2u".
But hey I am a "Southpark fan", so what do I know?