Ronkh
Wax Waster
WOW !!!!
My point of this thread was the great mileage that I got on my trip.
IMHO - 36+ MPG ain't too bad for a 460+hp engine, on a car that is able to do 195 MPH (nannied)
Since I have been racing since I was 16 y/o . There is no substitute for pure brawn.
Technology is great, but gimme good old fashioned Detroit iron (figure of speech) or mebbe a combo of both.
I'm old school where cid/compression ratio, a holley "double pumper", headers posi and 392+ rears is what made a car go, then mebbe add a blower (super charger for your youngins) and ya got something special.
To me it's sorta like the crash ratings of today - which would you rather be in? A suburban or smart car in a crash?
My point of this thread was the great mileage that I got on my trip.
IMHO - 36+ MPG ain't too bad for a 460+hp engine, on a car that is able to do 195 MPH (nannied)
Since I have been racing since I was 16 y/o . There is no substitute for pure brawn.

Technology is great, but gimme good old fashioned Detroit iron (figure of speech) or mebbe a combo of both.
I'm old school where cid/compression ratio, a holley "double pumper", headers posi and 392+ rears is what made a car go, then mebbe add a blower (super charger for your youngins) and ya got something special.
To me it's sorta like the crash ratings of today - which would you rather be in? A suburban or smart car in a crash?