Used to use 95 quite a bit because it arrived here first and then the first time I tried 105 I had some problems with it clumping.
95 cuts more than 85 but has a similar finish to 84.
I hardly ever use anything other than 105 now and I fully concur that slower speeds are more effective when it comes to cutting out deeper scratches. I'd advise caution too. I've had good results with 105 and the standard W7000 pad on black Porsche Cayenne's and I reckon they've got the hardest CC I've ever worked on.
Interestingly enough I had a 3M rep recently try to put me onto their range, knowing full well that I've had a fairly close relationship to Meguiars products for ages. we had an old BMW M3 to test on. The paint was pretty ****ed, badly oxidised and plenty of RID's beneath
He ran through the complete 3 step sand then 3 step compound/polish and I have to admit that the results were pretty impressive. The 4000 wetsand makes for a great surface to compound.
However, possibly to his dismay I suggested that it wouldn't be a fair comparason unless I did the other 1/2 of the panel with out usual products etc.. we used a Meguiars W4000 with 105 followed by a quick W7000 etc... finishing in 205.
We didn't wax or seal it with the Rep.
There was really no discernible difference in the end results although a couple of the guys in my team thought the Meguiars finish was better (just a matter of opinion really). The end result was the 3M rep after costing out his system at the best deal that he thought they could give me, suggested we'd be better of running with the products we were already using.
I had to agree with him
We finished the car with Meguiars 105 as the compound and didn't really need to wetsand many areas at all.