mjlinane
My name is Mike
Considerably more solution is used in a rinseless wash. Waterless product are have more polymers to encapsulate the dirt because they don't have the added water to help protect the paint. And because polymers cost more than water, WW are considerably more expensive to use. But, you don't need a bucket.
It is hard to tell in the video, but the 660 GSM MFs I was using for the first wipe probably held about 8oz of solution (maybe more). The method I demonstrated is an amalgam of rinseless and waterless techniques.
To me, the greater the solution, the greater the amount of dirt I can remove. I will tackle much dirtier vehicles with a rinseless wash than a waterless. In my spectrum of uses:
QD - freshly washed car
WW - dusty to very lightly dirty
Rinseless - dirty (add foaming and pressure rinse to attack even dirtier)
Traditional - very dirty.
The other areas I frequently use WW are the door & trunk jambs and final wheel clean (after more aggressive methods). Just easier to control.
It is hard to tell in the video, but the 660 GSM MFs I was using for the first wipe probably held about 8oz of solution (maybe more). The method I demonstrated is an amalgam of rinseless and waterless techniques.
To me, the greater the solution, the greater the amount of dirt I can remove. I will tackle much dirtier vehicles with a rinseless wash than a waterless. In my spectrum of uses:
QD - freshly washed car
WW - dusty to very lightly dirty
Rinseless - dirty (add foaming and pressure rinse to attack even dirtier)
Traditional - very dirty.
The other areas I frequently use WW are the door & trunk jambs and final wheel clean (after more aggressive methods). Just easier to control.