deznium said:
I guess you probably don't know much about BMW paints. All BMW paints are soft and so are Infiniti, Lexus and Acura paints. This is due to some environmental related regulations.
As to be specific, between metallic and non-metallic BMW paint, the softness and clear coating is the same. It is a misconception that jet black paint is softer. You pay those $500 for the metallic flakes, which are only visible if you're 10 inches from the car. The metallic paint does have a flake-layer on top of the paint but the clear coat (where the swirls and scratches exist) depth is the same on all BMW paints. The jet black seems more softer because it shows almost everything and slightly more than black sapphire; even the lightest scratches since it is more glossy and deep. If jet black/black sapphire had different layers of clear coats, then BMW would be dis-obeying those environmental regulations. All BMW owners don't like their paint jobs. This is a very popular topic of discussion in many BMW forums.
It's a shame this thread is going to go this route, but I guess there is nothing to be done about it.
Before I go on, some points. Not all BMW owners dislike their paint jobs. We can both find examples of people on e90post, mpost, bimmerfest, etc that dislike and like their paint. That's anecdotal evidence, it's like saying all BMW's are unreliable because some guys on bimmerfest say they are. On that same note, you can go on ANY car forum and find guys who hate their paint. Infinit, Acura, Mercedes, BMW, Lambo, Ferrari, Porsche, it doesn't matter; someone somewhere is going to complain. Which leads me to my next point.
deznium said:
Which BMW do you own? Which year, model and color?
Usually I'd say this doesn't matter, but if it'll help prove I have some experience, I own a 2007 BMW e92 335i in sparkling graphite and a mini cooper s (2006) in pepper white. I've also owned a 2002 330xi in titanium silver and a 2000 M3 in imola red. My current BMW has ~50k km and I've owned it since December 2006. I picked it up in Munich in October 2006.
In the last two years I've worked on over 150 current model BMWs. By worked on, I mean compounded. So in terms of detailing I'd say I have at least as much experience as the next guy. I can say with no hesitation that in my experience not all BMW paint is soft. Is a lot of it? Sure. Is all of it? No. Space Grey, Sparkling Graphite, Montego Blue, Tasman, Bluewater, TIaG, Deep Sea Blue, Mineral White and Cashmere Silver are all on the hard side of average. Of course average is relative. I like to think that since I compound just under 400 cars a year I have a decent grasp on "average paint hardness".
So here's the thing; you don't have to believe me, but at some point when enough people that do this day in and say out are telling you you're incorrect, you may have to re-evaluate your position. This isn't a "the world is flat" type argument, we're just telling you that in our experience, whether it's minute or vast, BMW's flat colours tend to be "softer" than the metallics. If I were alone in this opinion I may seek further evidence, because it'd be possible that I was wrong; but I'm not alone. Between this forum, dc, dw, etc, 95%+ of detailers have agreed that the flat bmw colours are softer. Are we all wrong?