imported_Dave11
New member
TH0001 said:Also I am stung because I was the first person to post that Menzerna fills
Todd, can you tell me what product specifically is in 106FF that fills......?
Thanks......:up
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TH0001 said:Also I am stung because I was the first person to post that Menzerna fills
lecchilo said:While I haven't experienced any long term marring coming back (I really don't think the testing for this has been consistent because you never know, even with great washing techniques you MIGHT be doing something to the finish... I guess the only way to find out is to do it on some garage queen which won't get any sort of dirt on it ...
Dave1 said:Todd, can you tell me what product specifically is in 106FF that fills......?
Thanks......:up
Accumulator said:Let me post my experience. This is just for info purposes and is *NOT* a slam at anybody or anything. I don't have a dog is this fight as I have never used 106FF and don't plan to, and I certainly don't care if others use it or not. OK, disclaimer over...
My Denali XL was detailed by a *VERY* good pro (and a member here). Final steps were 106FF by rotary folowed by 106FF by PC. Waxed with Collinite. Looked super, no problems. It then sat in the corner of my shop for months while I drove my beater-Blazer instead. No wash, no use, nothing; it just sat except for a few brief errands and whenever I moved it around/outside. When it was outside it continued to look super...no holograms, that's for sure. The Collinite was still 100%, everything looked exactly like it did when I first parked it save for a light layer of dust.
*EXCEPT* that a few months later I sold the Blazer, and when I pulled the Denali XL out into the sun to start using it.....it had holograms that absolutely were not visible previously.
I washed it (no, I didn't induce any marring) and the Collinite was still beading just like new. I was surprised that the holograms appeared even though the LSP was still OK. Over the next few weeks even more holograms started to appear, until it finally because obvious that I had to redo the vehicle. Based on the difficulty I had in doing said correction, some of the previously hidden holograms seemed to be quite severe, the sort of thing I wouldn't expect to be so well hidden for so long no matter what.
Based on the above, I can't help but think that the 106FF does a fair amount of concealing, even when used by a good detailer. Would a solvent wipe-down have helped (AFAIK he didn't do that), I dunno :nixweiss But this was a whole lot of concealing that lasted for months.
TH0001 said:No I cannot. But I can tell you the rep in England mentioned that the 106 series uses a waxy lubricant and that each product uses an oil in water emulsion (most likely mineral oil, from my understanding). I can tell you that mineral oil will mask defects by itself.
Furthermore I can tell you enough (more then 50 people I believe) have made comments regarding Menzerna filling, and that should be enough, esp. when the names of the detailers who have stated this are amongst the highest in regard and guys I look up too.
I think its more important to acknowledge the problem exists but I doubt that will happen.
Dave1 said:Well Todd, I hear ya but, in a court of law.....you need a body.
Find out what's in Menzerna 106 that fills and you win your case.....:bigups
The manufacturer may not tell you for obvious reasons. IF lubricants "fill", test the lubricants. If it's something else, test that......
I'm used to seeing you break down your details to the bone with information and I always look forward to learning something from your efforts. Many here have seen the effects you first mentioned and it's probably a given that other companies have their secret formulas that are not open to the public to copy.....
My personal take:
Knowing that a wipe down may be necessary depending on the LSP, I personally don't get angry about a product that has excellent results in paint correction........
Have a good July 4th weekend.......:up
SuperBee364 said:Dave, *no one* was getting angry about a product that has excellent results in paint correction. *Everyone* was getting angry about Menzerna USA's response when they were made aware of the fact that 106 and 85rd fills. Menz took a situation that called for an appropriate reaction ("Gee guys, you're right, it does unintentionally fill, and here's what you can do to fix it.") and turned it into a perfect example of how a company should *not* handle their customers. That's when the anger started.
Dave1 said:Well Todd, I hear ya but, in a court of law.....you need a body.
Find out what's in Menzerna 106 that fills and you win your case.....:bigups
The manufacturer may not tell you for obvious reasons. IF lubricants "fill", test the lubricants. If it's something else, test that......
I'm used to seeing you break down your details to the bone with information and I always look forward to learning something from your efforts. Many here have seen the effects you first mentioned and it's probably a given that other companies have their secret formulas that are not open to the public to copy.....
My personal take:
Knowing that a wipe down may be necessary depending on the LSP, I personally don't get angry about a product that has excellent results in paint correction........
Have a good July 4th weekend.......:up
Dave1 said:Ok, SuperBee......:up
Now you get Menzerna in Europe to admit that 106 fills and you win......
It's that simple.....
If the "USA" version of the story is different than the OEM German version I'd be shocked.......Mr. Silver may, just may be posting something from the parent company as far as we know here at this point....
Perhaps some of our German friends here can chime in with some inside knowledge that will give us all some additional understanding......
TH0001 said:Are you saying that the results that a lot of us have had are not happening because I cannot tell you why they happened? (This is what I got from your post but I am not sure if this was the message you meant).
Holden_C04 said:Autogeek ought to be careful advertising such claims. I think this could be regarded as false advertising.
TH0001 said:1.) So if Menzerna (Germany) denies it fills, that gives aminesty to those who sell the products as well?
2.) Additonal understanding of what?
GatorJ said:Please, I don't think so. How in the world do you disprove their statement? Maybe you ought to be careful what you accuse site sponsors of doing.
Dave1 said:1.) Basically yes.....If the mother company backs up what their distributer said, what other conclusion can you come to......?
The guy may be a jerk and I completely understand your point here Todd, don't get me wrong......
Holden_C04 said:106FA is not a new product. If you do some searching for yourself, you will find it has been around for a very long time so it can't be a "new and improved" 106FF. I don't know the whole story and Menzerna doesn't tell the whole story either. I simply recognize and question when a retailer starts up a whole new marketing campaign based on previously unreported information. It may be true, and it may not be. But I am certainly skeptical.
TH0001 said:1.) So if a little kid grows up to be a murder and his mother was a murder, do we just shrug our shoulders?
2.) Perhaps Jeff, as I have seen him viewing this thread at least 3 times today, could comment as to whether Menzerna (Germany) told him to call me a liar and indirectly insult my skill level as well?