Cyclo vs Flex

GoudyL said:
Beh, in about a 6 months, we'll be getting alot of "My clearcoat just failed :( , what should I do??" posts. :nono



IF they just correct it *once* then keep it nice they should be OK.



I have vehicles that were *hammered* with aggressive products/approaches and they're still fine years later.



The big thing is that people can't keep doing serious correction over and over.
 
reparebrise- I think about a Dynabrade now and then...not sure why I went with the Flex instead :think: I have more polishers than I need by far but I *would* like to do a side-by-side between the Dynabrade and the Flex.



For some reason the Dyanbrade just *looks* like it wouldn't be all that user-friendly. Wouldn't surprise me if I were *completely* wrong about that...can't always tell by looking.



Heh heh, I'll probably have the Dynabrade rattling around in my head for a while now :D
 
Accumulator said:
IF they just correct it *once* then keep it nice they should be OK.



I have vehicles that were *hammered* with aggressive products/approaches and they're still fine years later.



The big thing is that people can't keep doing serious correction over and over.





How does one define "serious correction" though? Is an orange pad/SIP once a year serious or mild? Is it the amount of pressure one had to exert? The number of passes?
 
efnfast said:
How does one define "serious correction" though? Is an orange pad/SIP once a year serious or mild? Is it the amount of pressure one had to exert? The number of passes?



I'd go by the amount of clear removed. In the absence of an ETG, I'd judge that by how severe the marring is and how completely it's removed.



E.g., I can use orange/M105 on the Audis and my GMC without taking off an appreciable amount of clear (good thing as that GMC is almost at the point where I can't correct it any more). For lighter marring I can use M105 with a softer pad. It *takes* something like that to remove even the lightest marring in a timely manner on those hard clearcoats, and M105 can behave rather gently depending on the pad/pressure you use with it.



Now if I tried that on the MPV I'd run out of clear in a moment...that vehicle gets much milder treatment and if that eventually means I have to live with some marring, well...so be it (or knowing me I'll have some more paintwork done...with lots of extra clear :D ).
 
Got my Flex today; I can see why people really like it so much.



LEAGUES better than a cyclo for correction (although I think the cyclo is better for sealing/waxing).



For correction I'm finding myself using SIP and an orange pad - spread it in at 2, several passes with medium pressure at 6, then back off to 5 for a few passes and finish at 3.



Then go to 106 - spread at 2, several passes with minimal pressure at 6, then a few passes at 5, and finish at 3.



Is the above 'okay'? I'm finding decent results, but wanting to make certain I'm not wasting my time (I remember when I first got my cyclo, I thought I had to go orange/83, green/83, white/83, then orange/80, green/80, white/80, hehe, so I figured I'd make sure I've got the Flex basics down and not wasting unnecessary time somewhere!!!)
 
efnfast- Eh..if it's working then it's working :D



I haven't tried the "up and down the scale" thing with the Flex's speed but I'm using different products.



Oh, and I wonder if you'd find a light burnishing/jeweling via Cyclo to be a worthwhile final touch :think: I sorta prefer that over doing it all via Flex.
 
Back
Top