Guitarist302008
New member
I had no idea about the stuff until I went on the forums pro section and saw it. It says the appearance is very glassy which is what i'm after. Has anyone used it or seen it or anything?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
toyotaguy said:great projected durability
resek said:I have a question concerning these kind of coatings (OC, 22PLE, etc).
Since I live in Canada, Quebec ... and we have the beautiful winter season approximately 4-5 months / years, it's difficult to keep a car defect free (see impossible especially because of the snow broom).
Do you think it could still be possible to apply a coating even without removing all the swirls/defects?
Do you see any problem about proceeding that way?
Let me know your thoughts please.
Thanks in advance!
![]()
David Fermani said:Looking to try it very soon actually. The owner of the company is a really nice guy. Gonna put it up to OC & Finest to see how it holds up....
Guitarist302008 said:I had no idea about the stuff until I went on the forums pro section and saw it. It says the appearance is very glassy which is what i'm after. Has anyone used it or seen it or anything?
RaskyR1 said:22ple does look good (better than OC) and is easy to use. I've been comparing it to Opti-Coat Pro and CQuartz Finest for a while now and I prefer CQF in terms of looks and sheeting ability. OC seems to have it for long term durability and chemical resistance. 22ple is probably the easiest to apply in terms of not having issues, but OC is by far the fastest to apply and get out the door.
On a solid black test pan with all 3 coatings applied, it's night and day in terms if darkening and CQF is an easy sell! Down side is that CQF is only available to approved installers so 22ple would still be a good choice over OC in terms of looks as is available to the public.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Guitarist302008 said:I looked into CQF but it is sooooooooooo expensive next to all of the other coatings... 245.00 just for the little box with a warranty card? I'll pass unless someone really wanted it done.
Richard Grasa said:You can certainly apply the coatings without correcting the paint, but the problem is that any defects are going to be locked under it until the coating either wears off or you abrasively remove it.
resek said:Thanks Richard for your answer.
I totally understand the fact that defects would be locked under until it wears off ... but the thing is here in Quebec, there's not a big market for the TOTAL process (full correction) especially because of the winter season.
People knows no matter what, they will damage their paint once this season arrives.
That's why I was wondering if a coating could be applied without a full correction service prior the application. It would still give nice gloss + good protection as well.
What do you guys think?
Richard Grasa said:It would be best to give them the choice. Some will say don't do it without a full correction first, but if the customer wants the coating and wants to leave the defects there, then I say do it. Just educate them and make sure they understand the defects will be locked in.
Richard Grasa said:It would be best to give them the choice. Some will say don't do it without a full correction first, but if the customer wants the coating and wants to leave the defects there, then I say do it. Just educate them and make sure they understand the defects will be locked in.
Greg Gellas said:You and your company name are then "on" that car. Damage trapped under coating. I have denied coating a car due to swirls and RIDS. I didn't want to trap them under the coating for someone else to say who did your car? For me its more of a My work is my name. A car covered in swirls is not what I want to represent me.
Greg Gellas said:You and your company name are then "on" that car. Damage trapped under coating. I have denied coating a car due to swirls and RIDS. I didn't want to trap them under the coating for someone else to say who did your car? For me its more of a My work is my name. A car covered in swirls is not what I want to represent me.
Greg Gellas said:You and your company name are then "on" that car. Damage trapped under coating. I have denied coating a car due to swirls and RIDS. I didn't want to trap them under the coating for someone else to say who did your car? For me its more of a My work is my name. A car covered in swirls is not what I want to represent me.
Greg Gellas said:You and your company name are then "on" that car. Damage trapped under coating. I have denied coating a car due to swirls and RIDS. I didn't want to trap them under the coating for someone else to say who did your car? For me its more of a My work is my name. A car covered in swirls is not what I want to represent me.
resek said:I totally agree with you Greg ... but the difference is the Quebec's market versus yours.
People here are definitely not willing to pay for a full detail, it's kinda useless since their cars are daily drivers and they know once winter arrives, they will ruin the finish again.
Keep in mind that we have snow starting December up to April.
So the finish will see A LOT of 'snow broom' and it's going to put in swirls, etc.
FYI, it's snowing since Thursday here, so it's 4 days of 'add-o-swirls'.
I am not in the detailing business, I am only doing it on week-end for friends/family/fun, etc.
And a friend asked me about that coating and not removing the swirls/rids prior the job, that's why I wanted to ask the question here before answering him.