If by attack you mean earlier in this post, I was appalled by the statements to the effect,"I thought I heard they scratched" or "I thought we determined they were the same as the poor quality ones with a different packaging". As near as I can tell, these were unfounded "thoughts". If anyone DARED to say the same thing about a preferred supplier, all #@$%^ would break loose. What if I said "I thought I read a survey that Fords were the worst cars made in America" (I happen to own 2, by the way) or "Didn't we determines that Zymol causes the paint to peel?" I would expect to be challenged on such statements and, should further research prove me wrong, I would admit it (and, yes, I can point to an occasion where I misread and misquoted something and later retracted it). I expect the same from others. Obviously, my methods here are too abrupt for this audience and I will soften it in the future.
Note to self: don't get so excited next time Nagchampa discovers something new! 