David Fermani
Forza Auto Salon
GoudyL said:Happy Customer.
I guess some people are easy to please.
How's the saying go? Walks like a shill, talks like a shill, therefore.....:beware
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GoudyL said:Happy Customer.
GoudyL - Point Blank - What is you affiliation with Turtle Wax?
Dsoto87 said:I have nothing against OTC products. I think its pretty cool when people get spectacular results using them, but Goudy goes beyond that.
His posts dont promote just OTC products in general but specifically TW products.
Brandon1 said:NXT 2.0 does not hold a candle to this product and it is not sub-par. Have you ever used it? I'm not agreeing with Goudy, seems like he does have an affiliation with TW, but I am standing behind the ICE Paste. It is one of the best OTC products on the market (excluding NAPA and Car Quest).
Darkstar752 said:NXT 2.0 isn't that great but it's better than the Liquid TW ICE. Haven't tried the paste and don't intend to. Want a great OTC (Somewhat, Harbor Freight has it.) wax? Try Collinite 915. One of the longest lasting waxes there is, if not the longest lasting. It's the paste version of 845, and has incredible looks behind it too. Not the best looks, I prefer Rubbish Boy's Orginal Edition, but definitely the best overall wax, when looking at price, availability, looks, and durability it can't be beat.
Check it out here:
http://www.autopia.org/forum/pro-de...rizon-detailing-2005-jeep-grand-cherokee.html
That glow and looks are just amazing IMO!
GoudyL said:* Are not understanding that it doesn't dry/haze like conventional waxes (because its made of entirely clear ingredients and has no abrasives to form a haze).
If the reviews are old (pre 2008) then they may have used the old formula, which just like the first generation of Meg's NXT (before NXT 2.0) was not as good.
GoudyL said:IMHO if TW Ice could not be bought in stores and cost north of $100/bottle folks on autopia would be ravingabout it. The miracle pure polish that is clear and can be used on all automotive surfaces. Nothing like it in the world (except maybe ONR) :cooleek:
SuperBee364 said:Dang, I wanna get some of that... bad.
jDizzle said:last time i used non abrasive products, like 845, 476, surf city barrier reef, shine on package from surf city,mothers pure carnuba, s100, etc etc (all of which contain no abrasives) they each hazed up (especially the surf city stuff) are you going to tell us that all those companies are lying to us, and their products to indeed contain abrasives reguardless of their claims?? is TW the only company that tells us the truth anymore?? :spit:![]()
SuperBee364 said:Dang, I wanna get some of that... bad.
rydawg said::bawling: $100 a bottle and would be raving about it?????
I have had numerous pre-customers use it and not one of them raved about it.
I also had a hard time getting the embedded cheap silicones out of the paint.
GoudyL said:Rydawg, That's a very biased![]()
scary bill said:You are actually going to call out Rydawg about bias. :spit:
At least he is not a TW shill. He actually know about detailing and has pics to prove it. Where are your pics?
Darkstar752 said:TW representatives don't actually detail cars
And seriously, disagreeing with extremely experienced detailers about their own line of work and the products they use? WTF? Haha if it was anything else, Goudy would be like sure, that hot tub is nice, but here's a warm puddle over here that does the same thing! :laugh:
GoudyL said:Rydawg, That's a very biased sample, since people who are happy with TW Ice probably aren't buying your services, are they? :hm
Methinks you should stick to detailing and not statistical inference. :lol: Google surviviorship bias, and story of Abraham Wald and the WWII bombers.
Digital Roam: The hole story: What you don't see will kill you
If we wanted to draw valid conclusions from your highly biased sample we'd need to know an awful lot about TW Ice's relative market share, tendancy of different LSP brand's customers to be unsatisfied with that brand, and tendancy of those unsatisfied customers to seek out your services. We'd also have to adjust for the condition's of cars, and the distribution of car condition within brands, and tendance to become unsatisfied based on car condition and brand of wax used.
Only then could we determine if TW Ice generated a disproportionate amount of your "pre-customers".
Without knowing that, your biased sample is mostly useless for drawing conclusions, and is perhaps worse than useless since it might confuse and mislead people who don't know much about statistical sampling and bayesian inference.
Ultimately it can all be summed up in that people who are happy with TW Ice are not going to be your customers, and so you'll never see them in your shop. :hmph:
That's because TW Ice lacks durability compared to traditional sealants which can be easily removed with dishwashing detergent. :lol:
BTW: The TW Ice liquid clay bar will quickly remove TW ice.![]()
Google surviviorship bias
Darkstar752 said:TW representatives don't actually detail cars
And seriously, disagreeing with extremely experienced detailers about their own line of work and the products they use? WTF? Haha if it was anything else, Goudy would be like sure, that hot tub is nice, but here's a warm puddle over here that does the same thing! :laugh:
rydawg said:
rydawg said:Oooohh, sounds like I hit a personal soft spot.
I had actually met them at a car show
and told them their cars need polishing work and they hired me to make them beautiful along with using high quality products and teach them what to use to maintain it.
The outcome was phenominal and they were very pleased with the new sealant/wax I applied for protection.
I myself seeing how TWI looked on a few cars, do not think anything special of it. Yes it was ok looking, but nothing speacial at all. With all the amazing top quality products out there, TWI does not even come close in the looks department, let alone other factors.
Your strong "personal" claims for the product are very misleading
Please do not ruin their fun and get in their way with your TW nonsense.Now we are getting closer to the real issue.
If you don't believe me go ask Brandon1, about his experiences.
You calling me out on bias sample is funny!
Your ignorance of valid inference from a sample is pretty funny too. :lol
I had a feeling when I first saw this thread that the usual suspects (you, darkstar, and especially Dave) would turn up and divert it into personal attacks. I have not been disappointed at all. :xyxthumbs
Like I said in my original posting, the folks who ***** about TW Ice, either haven't used the product themselves, or probably didn't wipe it off properly with an MF towel (the whole greasy mess business).