This has got to be the most biased headline I've ever seen

[Banacheq]

In the introduction on that paper, there is no mention of this. Is it further in?

Before the Introduction, there is this paragraph:



ABSTRACT: We examine tropospheric temperature trends of 67 runs from 22 ‘Climate of the 20th Century’ model simulations and try to reconcile them with the best available updated observations (in the tropics during the satellite era). Model results and observed temperature trends are in disagreement in most of the tropical troposphere, being separated by more than twice the uncertainty of the model mean. In layers near 5 km, the modelled trend is 100 to 300% higher than observed, and, above 8 km, modelled and observed trends have opposite signs. These conclusions contrast strongly with those of recent publications based on essentially the same data. Copyright  2007 Royal Meteorological Society

 

[Holden_C04]

I think this topic is getting a little heated, unnecessarily.



Most of what I'm posting is tongue-in-cheek. I mean, I used to believe very, very strongly in changing everything about how we as a planet conduct ourselves. I have long since learned that this is not going to change and that I might as well enjoy the time I have, while I have it. So, while I believe in everything I post, it's not meant to be taken seriously. I'm just having fun right now.