Kevin Brown said:
Keep in mind that when you drop backing plate diameter, you are essentially shrinking the "platform" size.
Kevin can you clarify what you mean by platform size? I understand you cover more ground with a 6" pad, but isnt the main advantage the 21mm orbit compared to smaller orbits? Would having a 5" backing plate with 21mm out perform other 5" set ups including LHR15? Or am I not understanding this correctly?
I currently have the Flex 3401 with both backing plates and use 5" plates on my Griots,PC also. Just looking for clarification as I want to add the Rupes or rather replace other polishers with the Rupes if its that versatile.
Yes, the LHR21ES with a 5" pad will very likely outperform other 5" set-ups, and it will undoubtedly out perform the LHR15ES.
I've given a lot of thought to the LHR21ES. Here's a fun question:
Will the LHR21ES cut faster using a 5" or 6" setup?
I suppose that the 21mm ø machine outfitted with a 5" plate & pad
could or
might cut paint faster versus the 6" pad, but I'd have a good argument against the assumption that it
definitely would.
Although the machine's
polishing energy would be concentrated onto a smaller area (potentially causing anything
abrasive to
abrade paint more rapidly), it would also be loading with paint residue more quickly than a similar 6" pad, assuming the 6" pad was polishing the
same exact-sized area. When pads and abrasives are coated in paint residue, speed of cut
diminishes, whle scouring usually
increases.
If using a 5" pad, you'd be losing some
speed along the edge of the buffing pad (a larger diameter pad spinning at the same RPM rate is traveling a longer distance, hence more speed). So, if actual
speed instead of
pressure is increasing the speed of cut, then the 6" pad would have an advantage.
Then... if we instead focused on
repetitive scrubbing of the surface for a given RPM (taking pressure and edge speed out of the equation), imagine if you will the following:
If we were able to line up abrasive particles side-by-side along the edge of a 5" buffing pad, our "ring" of abrasive would measure
15.7" in length (circumference). If we then did the same using a 6" pad, the "ring" of abrasive would measure
18.8" in diameter. See? The 6" pad would scrub a particular area of paint
19.745% more per revolution!
We've all been using 5" pads and discs with our PC's, G110v2's, and Griot's machines because they don't seem to be able to create ample centripetal force (the force that causes the backing plate to start and continue to rotate). Basically, 6" pads or discs don't seem to rotate as quickly as their 5" counterparts.
In terms of the 21mm BigFoot, there's so much orbital motion and backing plate rotation going on (especially if the spacer is installed that eliminates scrubbing of rotational speed), that it's difficult to know whether we're gaining or losing cut depending upon the size of the plate & pad.
What did I mean about the platform size?
When you shrink the diameter of the plate & pad, the
platform or
support of the machine is
smaller. How does this potentially affect performance? Time to take our comparison to extremes, and out of the realm of paint polishing.
Imagine that you are sitting at a dinner table, and the tabletop is split so that an extension leaf can be placed into it. If you had a glass full of water (12" tall,
1" diameter) sitting on the table, and you decided to slide it across the table by pushing it along with your finger (and your finger was pushing the glass at its highest point), I suspect that the moment the glass hit the split in the table, it would tumble over, spilling its contents. However, if you did the same exact thing, but instead you were pushing a glass full of water that measured 12" tall,
12" diameter... the glass would be much more stable, and there's a pretty good chance that it would not tip over.
Back to the backing plates & pads: When encountering hood bulges, fender flares, or any other panel shape that is not totally level to the entire pad, the edge of the pad is going to have to navigate its way
against and then
up & over or
against and then
down & level to the shape. A large diameter pad won't transfer as abrupt a "kicking" or "karate-chopping" sensation as a smaller pad might, so the machine will be easier to control, and quite possibly feel "smoother" during use on complex surfaces.
Just as a panel's shape might cause the smaller platform to feel less stable or choppy, so too will angling of the machine. Add some tilt to the machine (in any direction... anything other that totally level to the polishing surface), and the same sensation will occur.
Hope this helps and doesn't instead confuse things even more! Abbreviated a bit for simplicity.