Beemerboy
Just One More Coat
Nice write up but the dude isn't cheap.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Money aside which-Flex or Makita is the 'better' machine? is the Makita from Japan?? which is more pleasing to the ear and hands??? AND I have read that you don't have to fight the Makita while some say the Flex likes to take walks on its own....
Appreciate the comments about the forced rotation being limited-how much pressure does it take before the r/o stops and it becomes a jiggler?
Appreciate the comments about the forced rotation being limited-how much pressure does it take before the r/o stops and it becomes a jiggler?
Hey Todd,I wrote this to compare to the two forced rotation polishers:
A Makita BO6040 has a 3/16th inch stroke with a maximum speed of 670 RPM & 5800 OPM.
The FLEX3401 has a 5/16 inch stroke with a maximum speed of 480 RPM & 4800 OPM (FLEX measures orbits differently, which is why it is rated at 9600, but apples to apples it is 4800).
I selected the FLEX and the Makita because they both move the pad in a similar motion, a reverse curly q. Let's see which one is moving more, both at the outer edge and the inside.
Assuming both are running at max speed and using a 6.5 inch pad (which the stock backing plates hold comfortably)
A 6.5 inch as a circumference of approx. 20.41 inches, so every time it spins, it travels that far. In one minute the Makita can spin a distance of 13,675 inches (outer edge). The FLEX only achieves 9,796.8 inches in the same minute, due to a smaller rotational speed. BUT THIS DOESN'T include the distance created by the orbits.
The small orbit of the Makita is .58875 (3/16's x pi) of an inch, which it does to a spot 5800 times per minute. The orbital distance of a Makita on wide open is only 3,414.75 of an inch per minute. The FLEX, develops nearly an inch of travel, .98125 inches, per orbit (5/16's x pi) which it moves 480 times per minute for a total distance 4710 inches per minute.
At the edge of the pad, the Makita delivers a total 17,089.75 inches of moment, where as the FLEX only delivers a total of 14,506. Edge Makita....
BUT and it is a HUGE BUT, the outer edge of the pad is just one small area of the pad. As we move closer to the pads center the orbital motion becomes proportionately more significant.
Movement at 1 Inch:
Makita: 5,518
FLEX: 6,218
Movement at 3 Inches:
Makita: 9,725
FLEX: 9,231.6
Movement at 6.5 inches:
Makia: 17,089.75
FLEX: 14,506
As you can see the numbers are fairly close across the board with the FLEX holding an edge towards the inside of the pad and Makita holding an edge towards the larger surface area of the outside of the pad. From a numbers standpoint, the Makita has slightly more polishing potential....
BUT, and again, a LARGE BUT: A 5/16th stroke is going to more more efficient at transferring pad movement through the pad to the paint at the expense of pad life. While there is no number that will substantiate the difference, I would say that what the FLEX looses in theoretical pad movement it makes up for with efficiency, resulting in fairly equal distance per time numbers for both machines. This would be, IME, my both machines are extremely capable of producing stunning results. (Any very similar results at that).
If you want to pay more for the ability to switch between Forced Rotation and Random Orbital Mode, then the Makita is the winner. If you want something that offers different pad sizes, German build quality, and a better price, get the FLEX. There is no wrong answer. Sorry for going off topic, I just love geeky conversations.
Hey Todd,
The comparison you did was with OPM's. How about when considering RPM's, is it all relative?
FWIW, from the research I did, the orbit of the Makita is 7/32 = 5.6mm stroke, not 3/16"(5mm).![]()
Is this suitable for beginners or cut teeth with the the traditional PC series?