Chris@Optimum
Optimum Product Support
During the last couple of days there has been a few discussions of AIO's and there abilities. One of which was whether they contain fillers. I hadn't seen that characteristic because I thouroghly work PS till it's invisible per directions but others had used a IPA wipedown to reveal some swirls that PS had hidden. Unable to explain the conflicting characteristics, I asked Dr G over at Optimum if he could comment:
QUOTE:
"Chris,
As you all know Poli-Seal is an all-in-one product that removes oxidation, light swirls, and seals the paint. The latter (sealing) takes place through cross-linking of polymers that are in Poli-Seal. When applying Poli-Seal via rotary or DA, you have to continue buffing long enough to remove the swirls otherwise the swirls will be filled rather than removed. Of course for deeper swirls it takes too long to remove them with Poli-Seal so the polish or hyper/compound are much better choices.
I believe Bence did an exceptional demo of Poli-Seal correction capability a while back and compared the results with Menzerna. If I remember correctly, after IPA wipe down Poli-Seal showed no sign of swirls marks. Of course if Poli-Seal is applied by hand, it will only fill the scratches since there is no correction mechanism. I hope this explains the differing results some people have experienced.
Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Thanks again.
David"
So, I gather that if properly worked there is no filling effect, but if applied by hand or not given enough passes to breakdown there is a filling effect from the unactivated abrasives and the sealant. This seems to be the reason we can see different results from the same product. I see a difference between a filling effect and when a product contains fillers like for a showcar or a vehicle with soft paint. I just wanted to post this to inform everyone who was in on the discussions that in this case we were BOTH right.
Comments Welcome
QUOTE:
"Chris,
As you all know Poli-Seal is an all-in-one product that removes oxidation, light swirls, and seals the paint. The latter (sealing) takes place through cross-linking of polymers that are in Poli-Seal. When applying Poli-Seal via rotary or DA, you have to continue buffing long enough to remove the swirls otherwise the swirls will be filled rather than removed. Of course for deeper swirls it takes too long to remove them with Poli-Seal so the polish or hyper/compound are much better choices.
I believe Bence did an exceptional demo of Poli-Seal correction capability a while back and compared the results with Menzerna. If I remember correctly, after IPA wipe down Poli-Seal showed no sign of swirls marks. Of course if Poli-Seal is applied by hand, it will only fill the scratches since there is no correction mechanism. I hope this explains the differing results some people have experienced.
Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Thanks again.
David"
So, I gather that if properly worked there is no filling effect, but if applied by hand or not given enough passes to breakdown there is a filling effect from the unactivated abrasives and the sealant. This seems to be the reason we can see different results from the same product. I see a difference between a filling effect and when a product contains fillers like for a showcar or a vehicle with soft paint. I just wanted to post this to inform everyone who was in on the discussions that in this case we were BOTH right.
Comments Welcome