M101

Here is what Michael Stoops of Meguiars said on January 4th regarding this ----

Re: New M101 Compound??????????
OK, we'll try to distill down the discussions that have taken place on other forums after some folks managed to obtain this European only formula here in the USA.

This is the first product that Meguiar's actually developed outside the US. It was still created by our chemists here in Irvine, CA, but we actually shipped our lead man for the project to Europe, along with a mini lab set up, so that he could quickly respond to testing and inputs and tweak the formula as needed. Pretty cool stuff, actually.
What is M101 designed for? Rotary buffing with a dedicated foam pad on European aftermarket (ie, body shop) paint.
Why "European" aftermarket paint? Because, unlike factory paint which is the same whether the car is sold in Europe, North America or Asia, aftermarket paints vary in different parts of the world. It's a high solids versus low solids situation with these different paints, and that can require different compound formulations to achieve maximum results. Oh, and for the record, factory paint is vastly different from a chemistry standpoint than the paint used in a body shop. If a body shop, whether in Europe or North America, were to shoot factory paint it would virtually never cure due to a body shops inability to bake it at sufficient heat and for sufficient time. It's just not economically feasible for a body shop to have that sort of equipment.
Why "dedicated foam pad"? While use of a wool pad is commonplace here in the US for sanding mark and swirl removal, in European body shops they almost never use wool. And rarely do they compound the entire vehicle - it's mostly spot repair following a repaint, and it's almost always with a foam pad. They also tend to run the rotary at fairly low rpm. So we've developed a dedicated foam pad to use with this compound, taking into account the cultural toward low speed rotary and anti wool bias.
Why did we send a chemist and mini lab to Europe? Lead time, really. Imagine if we sent product over there, had it tested, then had to tweak and send a new batch across the pond, repeat, repeat, repeat? It would have taken months. And we couldn't do the testing here because the aftermarket paint used in Europe is very different from that used here, due to environmental regulations.
So basically what we have here is a product developed for a very specific type of paint system and a pretty specific work flow. That a handful of guys have imported this back to the US (it is made domestically, just like all the rest of our products) and are finding success with it using either wool or microfiber pads is interesting, to say the least. At the moment we have no solid plans to introduce this product to the US market.
Michael Stoops
Internet Technical Specialist | Meguiar's Inc.
(800) 854-8073 xt 3875
[email protected]

Dan F
 
IME 101 can finish down better than 105. This all depends on the paint structure you are working with.

Its way more than just saying 101 has more abrasives/ drop than 105 the whole mixture appears to be tiny alterations to create 101.

From my understanding this product was developed for mass production in controlled situations. You can remove a lot of clear if you are not paying attention.

Try 101 using the water sprit method.....

Cheers,
GREG

Exactly what Greg said. The water spritz added to the work time as it does with D300. The finish was amazing compared to the way the surface was abused. Paint readings did shock us as the difference between the amount of surface removed with 105 compared to 101 was minimal. :inspector:
 
Well as some of you have already noticed from another thread on this forum, today I was offered a chance to do a hands on trial with Meguiars m101. Along with Tom Weed and Chris Dasher we proceeded to test the compound on a late model body shop reject Honda hood. First thing was Tom instilled major defects with #500 grit and two different grades of steel wool and a copper scuffing pad.This was followed by #1000 and #2000 grit paper in various other spots. First trial was with a Megs da and a M/F cutting pad. The #500 grit scratches were a little too much for the 101 as were the gouges from the copper scuffing pad. Next we moved on to various pads and machine combinations. The sweet spot was with the Flex pe14-2-150 and a LC hydro cutting pad. The working time with the compound was extremely longer compared to m105 both old and new formula. Knocking out the #1000 easily. Also compared it to some HD Uno and some Optimum compound. We all agreed the m101 was superior no matter the pad or machine selection. I apoligize that I'm not a skilled tester with a lot of technical info but I think we can persuade Tom and Chris to chime in and give a little more depth to my observations.
ps. If Meguiars dosen't bring something simular to this to the US market then the need to re-evaluate the marketing plans. I like what I saw today and expect most of you would have also.

Well said Paul, I think real surprise for me was how much wetter the product stayed versus M105, it worked great on the rotary with a maroon Solo wool pad, that blew through the steel wool scratches and took out 1000 grit sanding marks and up with this combo in one application. Only thing that remained was the really deep scratch marks that I placed in the hood with the copper scuff pad. One thing to note, we took measurements with the ETG-2 the entire time and we probably averaged 5.4 mils with 5.7 being the highest reading from what I can remember and 5.1 being on the low end. After we were doing grinding on this hood, I was getting readings in the avg. range of 4.5 mils. I would say that is pretty good considering what we put the hood through.

I have said it before and I will say it again...

If Jesus was a compound, his name would be M101.

LOL, I agree!!!

After further using M101, I just don't understand why it is not available in the States and difficult to find elsewhere.

I did manage to take out some 500 grit sanding marks on a Meg's DA MF Cutting pad; wasn't easy, though. It was only a spot, but when is the last time anyone tried to remove 500 grit sanding marks?

Surprisingly, M101 seemed to have a longer work time than M105. Tom and I each buffed an equal section using cyan Hydrotech pads on a rotary at 1200 rpm. At 45 seconds, the M105 was pretty much done. M101 cut up until two minutes and definitely leveled the paint far better than M105. Also, the dusting was identical to M105.


It was great to work with Tom and Paul again. A big thanks to Tom for hosting us and the barbecue!

Cheers,
Chris

Chris you are welcome, it was a pleasure and thank you for turning us on to that compound. I guess I was mostly amazed how much longer this product worked than 105 no matter what pad or machine was used. Just to expand a bit on what Chris said, we machine sanded the equal parts of the hood with 1500 grit sanding disks, then we both took off on rotary's with brand new Cyan 6.5" foam Hydrotech pads. We both primed our pads the same and started buffing the same time and same speed, bumping the rotary up to 1200 RPM's. As Chris mentioned, I was dry buffing at 45 seconds and added a another bead of 105 and started buffing again. I was fighting the 105 on rotary definately more than Chris was towards the end of the 2:00 minutes. While the defects were removed from both sections, I would say Chris's side was more level and left no traces of defects. I will also add that after using MF pads on the DA, wool on the rotary and cutting foam on the rotary, the foam was hardest to work with, maybe due to the it being a new pad or the size of the pads. The maroon Solo pad was like a hot knife thru butter!

No matter what else is said, to me, seeing is believing and what I saw was that it was much better than 105 for the tests that we did. I hope someday that Meguiars releases something similar to this product here in the US, as I would buy a gallon in a heartbeat!

Tom
 
I hope someday that Meguiars releases something similar to this product here in the US, as I would buy a gallon in a heartbeat!

Tom

I would agree as long as you take the words "something similar to" out of your statement. It boggles the mind that there's an existing formulation which obviously works well, yet they won't sell it.
 
You will all see my video of the d300, m015v1, m105 current version, and the uber fantastic much more wonderful than most will ever know, Jesus of all compounds I have ever tried M101, side by side comparison very soon.

I have said it before and I will say it again...

If Jesus was a compound, his name would be M101.

Hey Garry, IIRC you have some Uno v4 laying around right? How would you compare that to the others?
 
Meguiar's M101 does seem like a great product but if I'm hearing everyone correctly it's not available in the US just yet.

I've always found Meguiar's M105 to be short on the correction time and generally add a couple shots of spray to keep it going. Now, I'm not implying that it's formulated incorrectly but I always seem to need additional working time...

Looking forward to trying Meguiar's M101..:bigups
 
From Garry's comments I think he doesn't like M101 lol

Sounds really interesting and the reason why it was developed is interesting as well. It sure would t hurt Meguiars to try to do a limited run of M101 here and see how it sells. Since its made here anyway II wouldn't think it would be too costly to try. Use the same bottles just different labels.
 
If Jesus was a compound, his name would be M101.
well i have been thinking the same for M105 so...can anyone spare me a few ounces? =D i can try it out on the benz im wetsanding. hehe.?????

can someone dip theyre finger in this stuff & report back on its "grittyness"
 
greg, ive read a bunch of your articles. keep up the good work sir. maybe you can answer me. if you dip your finger in the 101 can you describe its "grittyness"?
 
well i have been thinking the same for M105 so...can anyone spare me a few ounces? =D i can try it out on the benz im wetsanding. hehe.?????

can someone dip theyre finger in this stuff & report back on its "grittyness"

Big A -----

Just cracked open a new 32oz bottle of Meguiars 105, after shaking it up for a minute or two.

It has just a little grittiness feel to it, white in color, like a lotion thickness.
It works great with L/C Foam wool pads, I have had great results correcting really badly scuffed airplane and automobile paintwork with it.
It just need a little spritz of water once it starts to dry the first time, and then settles down and really cleans up damaged paint.

Im 3000 miles away, but will be glad to send you some unless someone closer chimes in..

Happy New Year to ya'
Dan F
 
Chris, it sounds like the old M105 to me. Looks like a another buy in my wish list.

It sounded/sounds to me like it's even *better* than the old M105 (which in all fairness I never got a chance to use personally).

M101 does have a pretty gritty feel to it like an old-school compound.
 
Hey Garry, IIRC you have some Uno v4 laying around right? How would you compare that to the others?

Let me say that Uno isnt even a deciple when compared to M101.




OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH... Im gonna cause quite the stink when I post the video I did yesterday of the side by side comparison...
 
I still have some of the old M105 if someone is interested in it. I find it difficult to work with. I prefer the newer version.
 
just saw that quote from Michael Stoops on the meguiar's forum about M101 .. I really like the "we have no solid plans" part .. maybe there's hope in this if they see profit .. money motivates a LOT of people
 
Interesting that with all of the positive feedback on this product that they would not start sellin it in the states.
 
Back
Top