Is it true that regular ONR (wash&shine) doesn't require perfect drying?

[fellipe]

<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;">Read a user on another forum saying that he prefers the regular ONR (Wash and shine) instead of the ONRww because you don't need to buff.

<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;">As MF towels become damp as you dry the car, it's not necessary to perfectly dry each panel. You can let the panel dry by itself.

<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;">Makes sense?

 

[Zelfiris]

ONRWW has wax content in it and has more chances to streak.


 


ONR does not have wax content.


 


The extra buffing is just to make sure the streaks are not left behind.

 

[Dan]

Someone is splitting hairs.

 

[Accumulator]

There's always *some* degree of "buffing" anyhow.

 

[David Fermani]

I prefer ONR w/W. Very easy to use. Especially the drying factor.