Interesting Paint Sealant UV Comparison Video

I think as I am not sure (still amateur) that LSP does it's job by send UV light back. I mean if he used a gloss meter on a solid colour the test would hold more validity for me. I'm not sure how to explain it.
 
It's going to take me some time to dig out some real protocals for UV testing from what archives I brought with me when I retired.



When I do, will put up the "testing protocal" utilized by the paint suppliers to the American manufacturers as well as the vehicle manufacturers after they get the data from the paint suppliers.



Give a day or so, it's interesting, if one has the mind to put aside pre-conceved ideas and understand the what/why for, and such.



Grumpy
 
The lead in the glass is probably what is responsible for the 10% reduction in the UV. I wish he would have used Starfire glass. Not to mention in 10-15 minutes are all the sealants used done "cross linking"?
 
Lotuseffect said:
The lead in the glass is probably what is responsible for the 10% reduction in the UV. I wish he would have used Starfire glass. Not to mention in 10-15 minutes are all the sealants used done "cross linking"?
Click to expand...



He starts off by establishing the baseline by checking all 4 areas of the glass and showing 89% gets through. I don't think they claim cross linking with glass, though, I'm not sure.



This may not be the best test ever done but it's better than a lot of the stuff that's posted on the interwebs.



Robert
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top