cptzippy said:
Been reading a lot and saw and old thread similar to this. What would be your regimen for keeping your daily driver looking good for the longest time?
Ah, interesting to see how different people approach this. Here are my responses to your Qs:
How often would you correct?
I too basically do one "serious" correction when I buy a previously-touched vehicle, then I'll do *very* infrequent spot-corrections and occasional burnishings. Now that I have my wash regimen sorted out, I'm no longer doing post-winter corrections.
But I *will* do spot-corrections if/when I see something I don't want to live with, and those "something"s are usually so minor that nobody else would ever notice them.
On thing about my major corrections though- I sometimes stop well short of true perfection in a effort to maintain good clearcoat thickness. I'd rather have some leftover RIDS on a daily driver than thin the clear so much that I can never correct it again if something else happens to it.
How much of a difference would lsp's/permanent coatings make?
I haven't used the new coatings yet, but I do believe that stuff like OptiCoat is quite something. Just not something that *I* want to use on my vehicles (at least not as the overall LSP).
LSPs *DO* make an incredibly important contribution. From providing a sacrificial layer (think "bird bombs"), to keeping dirt from tenaciously holding on (and thus requiring aggressive wash techniques), to simply providing that "just waxed" look, LSPs are, IMO, essential. I've obtained never-waxed vehicles that were kept clean...you know those "you don't need to wax this special paint" sales-spiels..and those vehicles were in terrible condition compared to much older, higher-mile cars that were kept LSPed.
How important would paint decon/claying be?
If it needs decontaminating, then the decon is very important. If it doesn't, then there's no need to do it.
Regulars here know that I've been a huge proponent of claying ever since detailing clay came out in the early '90s. That said...
I spot-clay at every wash; it's my way of "cleaning aggressively". And I usually clay before polishing and/or LSPing. But I don't always do it (more of my Autopian Heresy

) and it's never a big deal. People kept vehicles perfectly nice for ages before we had clay, and I don't consider it utterly essential. Even though I go through more clay than six normal enthusiasts
And no, that "your wax won't last if you don't clay first" has never held true for me. Anyhow, far be it from me to discourage somebody from claying...just don't botch it up and mar your paint
How much effort would you put into marr-free washing techniques? (waterless vs say accumulator's no-mar techique)
Heh heh, I sorta get my own little spot at the extreme end of the spectrum, huh?!? Yeah...it's a pretty big production and I sure go through a lot of water and shampoo. Takes a while too, and it's harder work than running a few miles at a good pace.
What's the balance between keeping the car clean and inducing marring from washing?
I don't see it as an either/or type of balancing act because, since I use a "touch drying" technique (and I don't blot either...sorry), I have to get it perfectly clean or the residual dirt will cause marring when I dry.
But I guess it *is* an either/or in the sense that unless I can do one of "my washes" I don't wash it. So my vehicles can get mighty dirty between washes as I often have more important things to do. Not a problem for me, but it could be for somebody else since touching a dirty car will mar the paint.