imported_fireberd350
New member
I see a lot of people taking their pictures with the flash off. Or worse taking the before pics with the flash on or in the direct sunlight and comparing them to after shots in the shade under a tree.
Don't get me wrong the pics usually look amazing, but its not a fair comparison. With the flash on or direct sunlight you can see the imperfections 100x's more. I know taking a close up picture of the paint with the flash on does not look like much but it says a lot more. However if the before and after pics are both in identical situations (flash or not) then thats fine.
Not to sound like a skepticist but I could take a pic of a swirled up black car in the sun and do nothing else but back it under a tree and take another picture and just from comparing pictures alone I'd probably be able to fool people into believing I worked some sort of magic on the paint
I love looking at some of the amazing work people have done only to have the results spoiled by an unfair comparison.
Don't get me wrong the pics usually look amazing, but its not a fair comparison. With the flash on or direct sunlight you can see the imperfections 100x's more. I know taking a close up picture of the paint with the flash on does not look like much but it says a lot more. However if the before and after pics are both in identical situations (flash or not) then thats fine.
Not to sound like a skepticist but I could take a pic of a swirled up black car in the sun and do nothing else but back it under a tree and take another picture and just from comparing pictures alone I'd probably be able to fool people into believing I worked some sort of magic on the paint

I love looking at some of the amazing work people have done only to have the results spoiled by an unfair comparison.