Setec Astronomy
Well-known member
Oh, I thought you were talking about DavidB, not David Fermani 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Setec Astronomy said:Oh, I thought you were talking about DavidB, not David Fermani![]()
SuperBee364 said:Setec, it was a similar thread (discussing UV damage), but that wasn't the one. The one I'm thinking of was a multiple subject thread: CC thickness, UV protection of CC's, UV protection of LSP's. I *think* it was David Fermani who quoted the source stating UV protection in LSP's was worthless... I could be wrong, though. According to my wife, there's a *very* good chance of that...
salty said:Also to the OP, auto glass in itself has great UV protection built in.
nicknick said:No one here has answered his question. WHICH LSP PRODUCT GIVES BEST UV PROTECTION.
wannafbody said:My Z5Pro bottle uses the terms "advanced protection" in regards to the UV protectors. I think this a case of needing to call each manufacturer/reseller and asking the question direct.
wfedwar said:Yeah, you could, but how would you ask it? I don't know what kindof number would be assigned to this, and I seriously doubt anyone at these places would have ever done a real test on it anyway.
David Fermani said:Great point. :2thumbs:
OASN - It never seems like any LSPs have great lifespans on glass anyways.
JohnKleven said:You don't get very much UV protection from ANY wax.