the other pc
New member
The reason they're described as "car based" is because they are. They're cars. That's what they share all their parts and design features with, not trucks.RedondoV6 said:I read the Honda Pilot being described as a car based SUV, the Honda Odyssey of SUVs and as a value priced Acura MDX, IMHO there is some truth in all of these descriptions....
Honda makes fantastic cars, motorcycles, generators, etc. They just don't make trucks. Never have. That's just fine because there's no particular reason they need to. Yeah, they bought trucks from Isuzu (who makes a bunch of trucks but relatively few cars) for a while and badged them as the Passport when the SUV craze hit. But they figured out early that the public doesn't really want trucks. People really want big cars (that look like trucks).
Now everybody Toyota, Nissan, Ford, GM, etc. is making vehicles that share common mechanicals with cars rather than trucks because the public isn't looking for frame-on-chassis construction or humongous beefy axles and bad gas mileage. The public wants interior space, comfy ride and better mileage.
Ironically Isuzu, who doesn't have a mid-size or large car in their lineup, can only make truck based SUVs and nobody is buying them.
The pilot really is a great car and is a leader in what the industry now calls "crossover" vehicles. I think that the term used for the last half century, station wagon, is perfectly adequate but marketing folks hate people like me.
PC.