imported_jaobrien6
New member
A while ago I stated in another thread (http://www.autopia.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=38832 ) that I didn't think GW worked very well with a PC as it was too easy to apply too much, and therefore could be very difficult to buff off.
Well, I am changing my mind. I decided to try again today, and I found it to work very well. I used a LC finishing pad, shook the tin of GW, put the pad on top of the opening, turned it upside down and then back right-side up again very quickly, to put one "dot" of GW on the pad (it soaks in immediately). That is approximately enough product to do about half a panel or so (I think it soaks into the finishing pad quickly). At first, it seems that you put too much on (you can actually see the GW pooling on the surface some), but you just keep working it, and keep spreading it around. Once it's completely hazed over, and you've worked it to a nice thin, even layer, it wipes off super easily with a MF.
I don't think it's any quicker than by hand, since you have to work the GW a little bit to make sure it's not on too thickly anywhere, but I think I used less product and know it was less tiring.
So, for anyone who gave up on GW with a PC 'cause it was too difficult to get a thin layer, try again. Once you get the technique right, it works very well.
Sorry, no pics. The digicam had a dead battery when I finished, and it was dark by the time I got it charged up. Sorry!
John
Well, I am changing my mind. I decided to try again today, and I found it to work very well. I used a LC finishing pad, shook the tin of GW, put the pad on top of the opening, turned it upside down and then back right-side up again very quickly, to put one "dot" of GW on the pad (it soaks in immediately). That is approximately enough product to do about half a panel or so (I think it soaks into the finishing pad quickly). At first, it seems that you put too much on (you can actually see the GW pooling on the surface some), but you just keep working it, and keep spreading it around. Once it's completely hazed over, and you've worked it to a nice thin, even layer, it wipes off super easily with a MF.
I don't think it's any quicker than by hand, since you have to work the GW a little bit to make sure it's not on too thickly anywhere, but I think I used less product and know it was less tiring.
So, for anyone who gave up on GW with a PC 'cause it was too difficult to get a thin layer, try again. Once you get the technique right, it works very well.
Sorry, no pics. The digicam had a dead battery when I finished, and it was dark by the time I got it charged up. Sorry!
John