Well...that's what I was saying, it's hard to see where it's getting the air from (of course, air is thinner than water, or was that blood is thicker than water?...anyway). So maybe those Mazda engineers aren't so smart after all, if they went to all that trouble to design that crazy intake plenum to get no air. Maybe you are better off without it; I just always like to step back for a minute and think about why something that obviously took time/money was done. I was just looking at the snorkel on my Pontiac and it's basically stuck into the back of the headlight...where you would think there would be no air. But with that car, I have inhaled water from driving on the highway and going thru puddles that threw up a huge spray, so it appears that water can get there.
I like to think that engineering decisions are made for good reasons, and that your intake plenum was designed to make the car work better. It's possible, for instance, that they had to put that plenum on because they weren't passing emissions, and needed to drop the intake air temp by 1 degree and put that restrictive device on there to make sure they pulled more outside air than engine compartment air. At the end of the day, a specification is a specification, and you have to do what you have to do to meet it, no matter how goofy the solution might be. I'm sure they did it for a reason, whether the reason is important to the end user or not is another story.