Drive-by-wire Throttles

Setec Astronomy

Well-known member
I understand the 2005 GM 3800 Series III engines (or at least certain applications) utilize a drive-by-wire throttle. I know that Accumulator has had at least one bad Audi d-b-w experience; anybody have any experience with GM's implementation? Supposedly they reduce the gain at low speeds to "aid in parking", and increase it at high speed.
 
The 4200 I6 in my Envoy is drive-by-wire, I've had no problems at all with it, response is just as good if not better than a cable system like I had on the 4.3L V6 in my old Blazer
 
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05036/453222.stm



I know the article focuses on Toyota and Lexus but further into the article it mentions other vehicles having the same issue. My car has throttle and/or transmission hesitation at times.



The hesitation problems have been reported by owners of Lexus ES330 models made between 2002 and 2004 the Toyota Camry and Highlander and other Toyota and upscale Lexus brand models equipped with the same five-speed automatics.



A search of NHTSA records and interviews with Consumer Reports magazine also show owners of other car makes are suffering from the same hesitation problem, including BMW's 3 Series, Ford Explorers and Escapes, and Dodge Durango 4x4.



David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports' Auto Test Center in Connecticut, said the magazine's testers have encountered the same problems in the Audi A6 2.7T, the Audi Allroad, the Mazda6 equipped with the V-6 engine, and the Volkswagen Jetta 1.8T.




Spokespersons for those companies could not be reached for comment.



What makes the issue perplexing is that no two models of a given car brand may have the same problem. Some owners of the makes involved say they've noticed nothing, while others will say the problem is chronic.



One Lexus dealer, for instance, has said he was able to duplicate the problem only on a few of the cars on his lot, while many others didn't have the problem at all.



The problem involves the transmission gearbox electronic control unit and the engine management control unit, Champion said.



"It's the way in which the transmission gearbox electronic control unit talks to the engine management control unit. The integration of the two systems will allow the transmission to function in the right gear and the engine to provide the power instantaneously in a smooth fashion," he said.



"When you accelerate, the gearbox may change down a gear or find the right gear, and to make the transmission takeoff a smooth one, it retards the ignition to reduce engine power. Unfortunately, while the control unit works out what it's supposed to be doing, you're putting your foot on the accelerator. It can lose its way and doesn't energize the engine and transmission quickly enough," he said.
 
TW85, that doesn't really say anything about the drive-by-wire throttles. Which means that the gas pedal isn't connected to the throttle butterfly, it's connected to a potentiometer, which tells the computer how far your into the gas, then the computer decides what you mean by that, and if it's the right thing, and how much you really *meant* to push it, and rotates the butterfly by itself. Better not make any jokes it doesn't like.
 
I know what drive-by-wire is and it is mentioned in the article. One problem is it is meant to be more efficient and to do so, it doesn't instantly respond to every depress of the gas pedal (though theoretically it should be at least as responsive). Real world experience is usually different.



Read closer. ;)
 
TW85 HHI said:
I know what drive-by-wire is and it is mentioned in the article. One problem is it is meant to be more efficient and to do so, it doesn't instantly respond to every depress of the gas pedal (though theoretically it should be at least as responsive). Real world experience is usually different.



Read closer. ;)



I only read your quote, which doesn't mention that (I don't think). I am looking specifically for feedback on the GM implementation.
 
GM has been using them for quite a while as well as other manufacturers.....my 2002 avy has it....



Purpose is for more fuel efficient engines and better performance...



the pedal sends a signal to the computer and this signal is different depending on engine manufacturer engine computer....



most rely on a 0-5 VDC signal from pedal and the usuable range is from .5 volt to 4.8 volts...anything outside this triggers the check engine light....



some other manufactiuurers utulize:

PWM signal

Double PWM signal

double voltage signal

Idle speed switches

WOT switches

etc etc etc



I am pretty sure you would be hard pressed to find a new car manufactured today that does not have an electronic throttle



From my understanding of discussions with GM engineers is it allows them to do more things and also control the tranmissions a bit better.....ease of assembly....etc etc...



PS....I sell the pedals to the industrial market for use on forktrucks and other mobile equipment....





I bet in a few years you have brake by wire.....
 
I believe all C5 and C6 are DBW. I have driven several C5's and really never notice any difference to the point where I thought about this system after driving vehicles. In other words I always kicked myself for not closely analysizing the DBW when driving these vehicle to see if this old guy could detect any difference.
 
There is a definate lag in my cars implementation of DBW, and it takes some getting used to. I much preferred the older method, with the cable pulling the throttle butterfly it felt more responsive, more immediate.



I know its not directly related to the GM, but I reckon it is something you have to live with in today's modern cars?
 
Axe said:
There is a definate lag in my cars implementation of DBW, and it takes some getting used to. I much preferred the older method, with the cable pulling the throttle butterfly it felt more responsive, more immediate.



I know its not directly related to the GM, but I reckon it is something you have to live with in today's modern cars?



These are my exact thoughts also. My Passat has DBW and it is different. Sometimes it really drives me crazy, like if you go to pass a car and gun it to pull into the lane and then by the time the gas catches up to your foot you are back to easing off the gas but the torque jerks you forward like a slingshot. Sorry this isn't GM related.
 
I have zero complaints on the responsiveness of my Porsche Cayenne S. The response on the transmission and throttle are very smooth and "connected". I could not imagine going back at this point. Even the ignition, which is an electronic system, works better and is very smooth. The days of grinding the starter and starting accidents are over.



I took the Cayenne out in the mud the other day (at a high rate of speed!) and when I got back on the road the machine was smart enough to unlock the axels.



I have switched PSM (stability management) off on wet roads and the vehicle is all over the road. Switch it on and you'd never know the road was wet. This would not be possible if not for the DBW systems.



I'm sold and love DBW.
 
Same for me - it works flawlessly on my Acura. I'm not sure if it makes any difference but a do have a manual transmission.
 
My MINI has DBW and I have found it extremely competent and responsive. But I know from the MINI2 forum that if the EMU has a bad program in it, you can have all kinds of problems. And the dealerships aren't always aware of the damage obsolete or incompatible software can cause. They will look at the mechanicals, see nothing wrong, and assume you are inventing your own problems.



Not GM-specific, sorry. But by now the technology is so well-established that GM should have lots of industry experience to build from.
 
I have experienced some lag and hesitation, but I had the ECU reset and it has performed much better. There still is an occasional lag, but over all I'm pretty happy.
 
I have DBW in my Volkswagen GTI 1.8t, and I find the throttle response to be less than impressive. It feels like an eternity separates the time that the gas pedal goes down and the throttle blade opens. I know on the VW 1.8t motor that upgraded software will improve throttle response, but I don't have the $500 to plunk down on a chip right now. I have had the dealer reflash the ECU, which made a little improvement, but the throttle still doesn't respond like the cable throttle in my '90 Accord - a car that is much more sedate than my lil GTI.



Now, I'm not going to say that I hate DBW, this is the only car I've driven equipped with such a system. I have heard good things about certain BMWs (M5 and M3) and Porsches, etc. so I know the idea isn't generally bad, just poorly implemented in certain situations.



[/rambling]
 
Heh heh, I don't think we're really answering the Q but I think it's gonna come down to the actual vehicle in question anyhow.



IMO you gotta consider the individual specimen. I've had perfect DBWs as well as ones that ranged from irritating to downright unsafe (all with the same engine/trans combo and model year). Can make it tricky if you special order a vehicle; you gonna gamble that you get a "good one"? Better have a great relationship with your dealer.



FWIW, I'd take the "old" technology in a heartbeat. I'm just more confident in my abilities behind the wheel than I am in my abilities to predict what the DBW is gonna do and when. Getting a multi-second response time at the wrong moment can be fatal. Unless you've experienced this first-hand (sitting there with the gas to the floor, no response, with passengers screaming and everybody thinking "we're gonna die" ) I dunno if you can really appreciate how serious it is. But hey, I've had old style throttle cables break too....
 
Back
Top