Apollo_Auto said:
Me personally, I'd rather work my way to the top instead of letting the media "make me",
Are you implying that Dalton didn't work to get where he is? That's a pretty bold accusation, so if you're going to say that, you need to back it up.
Maybe I'm splitting hairs here, but promoting your business and "hype" are different things to me. One implies robust advertising, compelling referalls, and strong personal networks. The other implies contrived publicity, artificial excitement, or outright public deception.
I'll use movies as an analogy. When an actor goes on talk shows, and radio programs to discuss his current project, that's using his network in show-businses to promote his product. When the filmmaker stands outside a theatre and pays people $50 to look at the camera and say "That movie was awesome!!", that's "hype".
Now I don't know alot about the history of Paul Dalton or his business. But there are some pretty big accusations being thrown at him, and from what I've read so far in this thread, none of them are substantiated by any kind of compelling fact.
All I see here is a guy who used his skills, his ambition, and his personal network to promote his business. And he's proven himself by maintaining a strong clientele and successful operation.
We can argue forever over whether or not he's the "best" detailer. But when it comes to
running a detailing business, it's pretty obvious that few, if any, have done it better than he has.
Maybe it's me, but it seems that alot of people here think that "marketing" is some kind of underhanded, dirty trick. Or that it's cheating somehow. It seems to me that there are detailers out there who think that they should be successful just because they have a skill. Unfortunately, that's just not how business works. It takes more than that.
So to anyone who sees Paul's success and says "Bah, it's all marketing", my first reaction is that you're simply jealous. My second reaction is to say "well Einstein, maybe you should try 'marketing' yourself".
Look, I've seen the list of the 61 steps, it's been posted on here a bunch of times. And some of it is a bit 'over the top'. For example, the three steps of "clean wheels, rotate 1/4 turn, clean wheels again" could be boiled down to one step that says "clean wheels thoroughly". So yeah, you could probably paraphrase the entire 61 steps in 35 or 40 steps, but it's still the same amount of work. George Carlin summarized the ten commandments into one, but still maintained all of the intended virtues.
If he's selling 61 steps and only actually doing 54 of them, then that's dishonest and his marketing is just "hype". I haven't seen anyone present any evidence of this, so I can't conclude that the accusations or resentment toward Paul Dalton are anything other than jealousy.
There is nothing wrong with hiring a marketing firm to promote your company. It's not cheating. And it's pretty glib to say that that makes your notoriety "man-made" as opposed to "hand-made". Apollo - you're making some pretty bold accusations that suggest deceit or wrong-doing. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but I don't think I am. You allude to some evidence or hearsay that supports your claim, but you won't come out and say it. So you're only making yourself look bad.
My company puts out press releases all the time. And we refer to ourselves as a "World Class Manufacturing" facility. We emphasize that we've embraced and implemented the principles of lean manufacturing to meet customer demand on-time with exceptional levels of quality. Now there's no international committee that defines what is a "World Class Manufacturer", does that mean that we can't say that? As long as we deliver what we promise to our customers, then we haven't crossed the line from promotion to "hype".
To my knowledge, no one has offered even an anecdote that demonstrates that Paul does not deliver work that supports the claims he makes in his marketing. The closest thing I've heard is from Accumulator, regarding the uniformity of clear coat. Can someone post a link to where PD makes that claim, because I'm thinking it may have come out of context.
While achieving that level of uniformity may be impractical and unrealistic, that doesn't mean that going to that extreme wouldn't necessarily improve the car's look in the eyes of some observers. And while it's impractical, it's not impossible. Maybe that is a service that he offers to extremely wealthy and extremely discriminating clients who pay for that level of service. Every pro detailer on this board advertises "Paint Correction". Does that mean that every car that leaves their lot is completely corrected and 'flawless'? Of course it doesn't. Detailers do 90-95% swirl-free details every day, and openly admit it. It's all dependent on the balance between customer's expectation and price paid. If somebody drives up to PD's shop and says, "I want my clear coat uniform within x microns, I don't care how long it takes, or how much it costs", who would argue with that? Practical or not, if the customer's paying, and you can do the job, then go nuts!