Setec Astronomy said:
..I like the idea of the plastic housing; should be lighter. The on-off switch is in a convenient place. It says it's two-speed, how many speeds is the Cyclo?
The Cyclo is a single speed, so that's one point for the Twinster.
Another point for being more affordable.
But I for one wouldn't like the plasic casing as well as metal. Dunno if that's a point for the Cyclo or if it's just me.
While the Twinster's switch is located in the same place, it doesn't look as convenient as the long-pole switch on the Cyclo. But then I can see people finding the Cyclo's switch too easy to accidentally knock on/off. Guess that's a toss-up.
But if the Twinster bogs down, that would be a deciding blow- I'd take a used Cyclo over a machine that bogs down every time.
The inability of the Twinster to use the carpet brushes is a point for the Cyclo too.
Sorta a tie between them with personal preferences being the deciding factor (sounds familiar, huh?). But if the Twinster bogs down.....
Guess it seems really predictable that I'd go with the Cyclo, huh

In all fairness, I'd like to hear some first-hand reports of how the Twinster works when you put some pressure on it. If it doesn't bog down it could be a winner for people who don't want to spend so much.