In the auto repair & insurance business, being I-CAR *and/or* ASE certified means alot to employers. It has a direct impact on your hourly rate/salery. I'm sure the general public doesn't search for shops or techs that are in this association, and I don't think people will do that for detailing unless it's marketed heavily.
You are correct in that folks seldom search out mechanics, or auto repair technicians as they've come to be known by virtue of their associations, because of their membership in I-CAR or ASE. They want their vehicles repaired quickly, correctly, and at the best price possible.
Here's the ASE-Certified Technician's Code of Ethics:
1. I will strive to produce nothing but first-class workmanship.
2. I will take advantage of every opportunity to increase my knowledge/skills concerning the work I am doing. I will dedicate myself to lifelong learning.
3. I will use only those materials that are proven to be safe and recommended by the manufacturer.
4. I will recommend to an owner only that work on the vehicle which I believe to be necessary.
5. I will treat an owner's vehicle as I would my own.
6. I will attempt to correct any honest mistake made by another technician, without damaging the reputation of that person or their business.
7. I will conduct myself so as to maintain and increase the public respect for all ASE-certified technicians.
8. I will practice Service Integrity, which means that to the best of my ability I will always work for the best interest of the owner, my employer and myself.
While most ASE certified technicians probably come close to adhering to this code, there any number who do not, and there is no way for me to tell which ones do not. Thus the certification is an empty shell in that regard, which was the original impetus for the creation of the organization in the first place.
........and on that note, take a look at tenet #3. Materials........recommended by the manufacturer. Wonder how that got in there?
So, if a tech puts Autolite plugs in my Ford rather than Motorcraft, do we have a moral dilemma on our hands?
Let the customer rule. If I want cheap, I go Autolite. If I want better OEM parts, I go Motorcraft.
My vehicle. My wallet. My decision. Thanks ASE.
I think if the NAPRD pitched sponsorship to corporations who advertise on TV/Radio along with other their auto related products & services it would help out greatly. Imagine how much a TV ad could help if it aired during NASCAR, or any of the other programs on the SPEED channel?
I-CAR events are chock full of corporate sponsors, and they don't lay out that cash for nothing. They expect a return in some form.
How often have you gotten really ticked off at the amount of advertising shown while trying to enjoy a game, race, or other program? There any number of people, myself included, who will go out of their way NOT to patronize the products of a company that deems it necessary to invade my living room and bombard me with their commercials. I don't want to pay higher prices for their products to subsidize their ad campaigns. Additionally, I have satellite television. That medium was touted as a subscription-based, no-commercial alternative to broadcast television in the beginning. Now, I'm paying monthly rates and still suffering through commercials.
McDonald's knows that I know who they are and what they sell. So why bother advertising? Because they want the ad to reach me on my recliner, find me hungry, and somehow cause me to dislodge myself and run on down to one of their establishments. They're insulting my intelligence by attempting to snare me into an impulse purchase.
No thanks.
Besides, most folks go to the bathroom or kitchen during commercial breaks. After all, that's what commercials are for, right?
So much for a TV ad and marketing in general.