Here`s the "irony", or perhaps more correctly, the hypocrisy, of this whole situation:
You live in a country that you feel oppresses people of color or minorities , yet you are dissing the very country that allows you the freedom to express yourself about it. I agree, Mr. Kaepernick, does, indeed, have the freedom to express himself. Yet, if this expression is tantamount to "hating" the country that gives you this freedom, are you correct in doing so? Is this expression an extension of an individual who has used (I would deem the term "exploited") his employment in the NFL to forward his own opinions about a social issue to garner national media attention? That is the issue the NFL office and commissioner Rodger Godell will need to address, and do it quickly. Otherwise other NFL players will be making statement at team media events or displays on the field about social issues from gun control to abortion with no repercussions under the guise of "Freedom of Speech".
Don`t get me wrong! Mr. Kaempernick`s right to not stand during the National Anthem is the same right that I have in criticizing his decision and writing about it in this response within this forum. I cannot censure Mr. Kaepernick`s decision and expect no repercussions about my writing ANYTHING within this forum.It simply cannot be one without the other, even if I do not agree with it. My question is the NFL a platform to do so?
I know some are feeling, " If you don`t like it here in America, go play football in Canada!" For myself, it`s a VERY touchy First Amendment issue. Freedom is NEVER "free". Ask a family who has sacrificed a son or daughter in the military to defend these rights or a law enforcement officer in enforcing the laws of this country.