wax durability. NXT VS #16

G

gofastman

New member
looking for a comparison of durrability between NXT 2.0, #16, and XMT 180.

I think the nxt durability thing has been beat to death, but I havnt heard much about XMT.

How long do they keep beading water for? Which provides the best winter protection?
 
16 lasts a bit longer IMO, but the NXT has better filling properties



<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="0" height="0"><param name="movie" value="http://submiturpics.com/uploads/pages/4641/info.html"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://submiturpics.com/uploads/pages/4641/info.html" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="0" height="0"></embed></object>
 
Inzane said:
Not in my experience, at least not with the original version. Are they talking about v2.0?
Click to expand...



I think they were saying that even with v1. Remember, the line was that NXT was protecting even after it lost beading. I guess v2 made the protecting aspect more obvious.



Maybe Mike P can chime in, even though he doesn't represent Megs anymore. :D
 
Leaving aside cynical comments about why meguiar's might say NXT lasts longer than #16 ;) The #16 lasts a lot longer IME.



NXT isn't *bad* stuff by any means, but for durability I can't imagine it beating #16.
 
Alfisti said:
Megs and Mike Philips state that NXT lasts longer than #16.
Click to expand...



That's because they don't sell #16 anymore. Also, NXT streaks like a muther f'er I've found Mother's Synwax to be way better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top