baker
New member
This polish says for use by rotary or by hand but not dual action polisher, why is a pc a no no?
Meguiars M105
- Thread starter baker
- Start date
Holden_C04
New member
Didn't like the answer on MOL?
BAKER said:
megs has reformulated (*edit below*) it to be used with the D/A as well. with the old version, they weren't happy with the way it performed with the D/A, thus not recommending it (intially was supposed to be used by hand or rotary) but alot of people used it with the D/A with good results anyway. it just wasn't recommended by them...
jordanrossbell
New member
BigAl3 said:
I figured they would have done this...it would have been a bad move on their part IMO because of 105's reputation as a miracle product, lots of people like it. I think if a reformulation was to occur, they should bring it out as a different product...glad to hear it is the same product
baker
New member
Actually Holden, I posted at about the same time on both forums, to get a quicker answer as I was going to place an order from Eshine, who has it on special, then I noticed that it said on Meguiars site that it was not PC compatable.. I didn't even see an answer on MOL.
baker
New member
Thanks for the response BigAl3
Envious Eric
New member
AutoMagic® Products
look at the megs page and at the 105...I think its only like 78 bucks for a gallon instead of 95...
check out autodetailingsolutions as well...
oh and I use 105 via PC and a 5.5" orange pad all the time with great results.
look at the megs page and at the 105...I think its only like 78 bucks for a gallon instead of 95...
check out autodetailingsolutions as well...
oh and I use 105 via PC and a 5.5" orange pad all the time with great results.
Kevin Brown
New member
BigAl3 said:
This is inaccurate information.
It is absolutely a modified formula.
I know for a fact, as I blind tested these formulas.
I'm sorry... I don't know who CS is?
imported_Bence
New member
errm... Customer Service...? 
GeorgesBlazah
New member
Sent an email to Megs...lets see what they say 
EDIT - Well now I know who CS is :lol I guess my email has already been answered.
EDIT - Well now I know who CS is :lol I guess my email has already been answered.
imported_Dave11
New member
iamwaxman said:
Thanks for clearing that up........:bigups
KnuckleBuckett
New member
M105 worked pretty darn well with my Flex. Or are we talking solely PCs here?
GeorgesBlazah
New member
Flex and PC are essentialy the same thing no?
Junebug
JAFO
Flex and PC are essentialy the same thing no?
NO
NO
Accumulator
Well-known member
Not sure which version of M105 I have (got it fairly recently from AutoGeek) but mine works fine by Flex 3401 and PC/4".
Kevin Brown
New member
Inzane said:
The new stuff will have an icon on the back of the bottle showing that it's okay to use for DA application (such as this one on the back of the M205 bottle):
After some thought, I guessed that CS meant something like 'confidential source'..! :laugh:
Kevin Brown
New member
Bence said:errm... Customer Service...?
Umm, yeah. That makes a lot of sense now that I see it your way.
I thought CS was a person's initials or online ID, then I thought maybe it meant confidential informant...:idea
Oh boy.
SuperBee364
New member
Oh, man, I hope they didn't screw this stuff up on the reformulation. Ever since it was released, I've had my fingers crossed hoping they'd leave well enough alone, all the while thinking that all the complaining about how it worked/didn't work/wasn't approved for PC would end up making them change the stuff. Looks like that fear was realized.
For those guys that have used the new stuff, how is it different?
Off topic, but along the same line... I've been hoping 3M doesn't screw around with UF, too. Seems like 3M can't help but change stuff even when it doesn't need to be.
For those guys that have used the new stuff, how is it different?
Off topic, but along the same line... I've been hoping 3M doesn't screw around with UF, too. Seems like 3M can't help but change stuff even when it doesn't need to be.