Jackson trail verdict

GregCavi

GregCavi

Pinnacle Detailing Owner
Thought I woudl let everone know that the verdict is going to be told at 3:30 CT so what ever that is were you live. I think it will have some historical significance to see him locked up for ever. Or mabye he will be let off like OJ?

Greg
 
He'll be found guilty of providing alcohol to and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Not guilty on all other counts. Five years probation, no jail time.
That's my guess
 
He is a sick man, but im not sure jail is right for him, maybe a rubber room.

Either way, who;s bad now beotch :)
 
Well i just flipped on the TV and he will as usual be late to the courthouse. It sounds like he will maybe be an hour late.

Greg
 
I'm watching now, saw a Suburban, a Yukon XL (?), an Escalade and a Navigator in the motorcade.
 
It is my opinion that he is a Dead man Moonwalking. :D


Maybe he should ask Martha for advice on being a woman in prison?
 
GregCavi said:
Just proves the rich and famous dont do time. Martha being excluded from that theory.

Greg
Click to expand...
See, the fact that Martha went down disproves that totally. If she could have bought her way out then she would have. It was a petty white collar crime that nobody got hurt over. Criminals like OJ actually killed people. You also have to remember that he lost the civil suit afterwards. It was the cops and the crappy prosecution work and the stacked jury that won the OJ case.

I had lost faith in the US legal system until recently. I've been hanging on a thread waiting to see if they would give MJ a guilty verdict despite the obvious facts that it couldn't be proven. Whether he did it or not, the fact remains that the prosecution wasn't able to prove it and the jury paid attention to that. I may still not want to be a lawyer, but at least I've got a renewed belief in a system I had lost faith in.
 
Jngrbrdman said:
I had lost faith in the US legal system until recently. I've been hanging on a thread waiting to see if they would give MJ a guilty verdict despite the obvious facts that it couldn't be proven. Whether he did it or not, the fact remains that the prosecution wasn't able to prove it and the jury paid attention to that. I may still not want to be a lawyer, but at least I've got a renewed belief in a system I had lost faith in.
Click to expand...

I think You said it best "Despite obvious facts it couldn't be proven" I think that everyone harps on the fact that the guy had kids in his bed. And while this may be strange and unusual he was very honest about it and admited to this. (So the guy needs a little help here)

Looking at it from another prespective. I think this case was purely a quest of the treasure at the other side of the rainbow. They new he had money and they new that he was an easy target! End of story!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top