Interesting Slickness Differences Between Layering

O

OCKlasse

New member
Over the past three days, the car has been in the garage and has received the following:



1000P

DWG

1000P

AW



For some reason, the car was INCREDIBLY slick after just the initial coat of 1000, and has not felt AS slick as it did with that first coat. Ideas? I will say that the combo above is really something else, and in direct sunlight, the car appears several shades darker :o
 
OCKlasse- That combo sounds like what I generally *like* on my Jag, but not on our other vehicles. Sometimes that "darkening" isn't what *I* want: BF did that to my silver Audi, made it look like a completely different paint code when parked next to our other one.



IMO it's all the ...[stuff]... (I dunno what's really in them) in the glaze and AW compared to the FK 1000p's "cleaner" finish. And those other products must not end up as hard/slick as the FK 1000P. I generally wouldn't expect a glaze or a wax to end up as hard and slick as a sealant like FK 1000P, which is one mighty slick product (at least in my limited experience, just started playing around with it).
 
Accumulator said:
OCKlasse- That combo sounds like what I generally *like* on my Jag, but not on our other vehicles. Sometimes that "darkening" isn't what *I* want: BF did that to my silver Audi, made it look like a completely different paint code when parked next to our other one.



IMO it's all the ...[stuff]... (I dunno what's really in them) in the glaze and AW compared to the FK 1000p's "cleaner" finish. And those other products must not end up as hard/slick as the FK 1000P. I generally wouldn't expect a glaze or a wax to end up as hard and slick as a sealant like FK 1000P, which is one mighty slick product (at least in my limited experience, just started playing around with it).
Click to expand...



Makes sense accumulator...btw I use accumulators on my hydraulic setup :chuckle:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top