I can't seem to spot *everything* unless I inspect under different lighting conditions.
Bright sunlight is almost a must, some things like holograms are only visible under this.
Otherwise, I see more problems under high-wattage incandescent lighting than I do under halogen, let alone fluorescent. I have a *LOT* of 8' fluorescent tubes in my shop (dozens of 'em), but when I need to inspect, I turn them off.
Sometimes, halogens almost seem to "wash out" what I'm looking at, especially with metallics :nixweiss I find it very surprising, but for me, it's incandescents when I'm looking for marring.
On the S8, I drove myself *nuts* trying to spot every flaw in the (repainted) silver...spent days on it and thought I had it as good as I could get it. But with the bare incandescent bulbs in our "regular" garage (not the "shop"), I still see some things I wish I'd spotted before

If you look under sunlight/halogen/fluorescent, you *DO NOT* see them.
Whether I remove fillers depends on the job and what stage I'm working. I generally do my rotary work, and the first pass with the Cyclo, with 3M PI-III stuff, no fillers. When I'm satisfied with how things look with that, then I move to 1z stuff. Filled/removed/combination of the two, I just accept it. I've tried doing the 50/50 spritz and finishing up with FP, but for my situation, those measures are unnecessary overkill.
FWIW, I find I'm sorta getting away from a "purist" approach, where I would insist on really *removing* all the marring all the time. Now, I just want the vehicles to look good for a long time, and I'm OK with products like 1Z polishes that might do a little "hiding".