Heh heh, it's about time that
ebpcivicsi and I finally disagreed about *something* :chuckle:
Heh heh, OTOH, if I had
ebpcivicsi's rotary skills I'd only be using the Cyclo for LSP on/off and scrubbing carpets
I've done some fairly direct comparisons and found that the Cyclo did more correction for me than the PC unless I fitted the latter with 4" pads (I used 5" pads with the PC back in the day but haven't tried the modern low-profile ones). But I'll say that "more power" isn't why I use the Cyclo instead of the PC; I simply like how it handles/etc. better.
I can't think of another power tool, of *any* type, that I like using more than the Cyclo! A lot of that is probably just familiarity (I got my first Cyclo over 20 years ago), but I simply love using the things. I'll apply/remove LSPs when it doesn't need doing just because I enjoy it, and (warning, more of my Autopian Heresy follows

) to be honest I don't actually *enjoy* detailing very much...so for me to do something unnecessary says a lot.
While I'm concerned about the bad-cord issues that others have experienced, my Cyclos have been utterly trouble free (even when the older one was used in an abusive commercial environment). That's a lot more than I can say about my PCs.
The only times I use something else are when the Cyclo won't fit a vehicle's contours (e.g., the XJS) or when I need the power of a rotary. Or *maybe* if I'm doing a very small spot-repair where anything larger than a single 4" pad will make the job tougher. OR, if I'm using AIO or Meg's #5. Gee, I guess the PC *does* have its uses after all!