Desertnate
Active member
The CanCoat I applied late last summer on my wife`s Highlander was starting to wear out, so it was time to apply another coating. This time around I used CQuartz UK 3.0 and I thought I`d share my thoughts on applying the product some things I learned during the process. Last year, I applied CQuartz UK 2.0 to my daughter`s car and I was really pleased with the results and how the coating has held up since then. However, with any new version I wasn`t sure what to expect.
In no particular order:
- CQuartz UK 3.0 seemed a little thicker in consistency than 2.0, though it still spread easily.
- Flash time was far longer in the right conditions, almost too long. Due to weather conditions outside, the temps in my garage varied during the application. It started out in high 70`s low 80`s, and after it started to get really warm I opened the door to my house and let the A/C bring things down to the mid-70`s. When the temps were at their most comfortable in the mid 70`s it took forever to flash. I found myself applying the coating to multiple sections and then going back to buff them out because I became tired of standing around waiting. 2.0 would not flash so fast it was difficult to use, but I wasn`t standing around either.
- 3.0 seems more temperature sensitive than 2.0. It might be I had a fairly stable environment when applying 2.0, but I remember the flash time was pretty consistent throughout the entire application process. With 3.0 I noticed it varied widely with only a 10 degree temperature swing. In the mid 70`s it would flash almost too slowly. In the upper 70`s/low 80`s seemed the sweet spot. At one point, when doing the rear hatch of the vehicle, I had to open the garage door due to space. The outside temps were around 85~88F and the stuff flashed almost instantly. It was so bad I quickly closed the door as soon as possible and then waited for the garage to cool down a bit before moving on.
- 3.0 spread MUCH farther than 2.0. Maybe I`m becoming better at application, but I used approx 25 of the 30mL`s of 2.0 to coat a second-gen Mazda 3. With that in mind I bought a 50mL bottle to do the Highlander. I applied what I thought was a similar amount to the applicator as the previous application, but this time I only used about 15mL`s to do the entire SUV! I`d bet I can do my other two cars with what is left over...and maybe a set of wheels.
- Appearance and performance-wise, 3.0 is another home run like 2.0. The Highlander looks fantastic and after a good hard rain last night the vehicle is perfectly clean and the water is beading up really tight. I have no doubts it will hold up as well as 2.0.
Overall, I`m really pleased. Good thing because I now have to figure out how to use up another 30mL`s of the stuff before it goes bad!
In no particular order:
- CQuartz UK 3.0 seemed a little thicker in consistency than 2.0, though it still spread easily.
- Flash time was far longer in the right conditions, almost too long. Due to weather conditions outside, the temps in my garage varied during the application. It started out in high 70`s low 80`s, and after it started to get really warm I opened the door to my house and let the A/C bring things down to the mid-70`s. When the temps were at their most comfortable in the mid 70`s it took forever to flash. I found myself applying the coating to multiple sections and then going back to buff them out because I became tired of standing around waiting. 2.0 would not flash so fast it was difficult to use, but I wasn`t standing around either.
- 3.0 seems more temperature sensitive than 2.0. It might be I had a fairly stable environment when applying 2.0, but I remember the flash time was pretty consistent throughout the entire application process. With 3.0 I noticed it varied widely with only a 10 degree temperature swing. In the mid 70`s it would flash almost too slowly. In the upper 70`s/low 80`s seemed the sweet spot. At one point, when doing the rear hatch of the vehicle, I had to open the garage door due to space. The outside temps were around 85~88F and the stuff flashed almost instantly. It was so bad I quickly closed the door as soon as possible and then waited for the garage to cool down a bit before moving on.
- 3.0 spread MUCH farther than 2.0. Maybe I`m becoming better at application, but I used approx 25 of the 30mL`s of 2.0 to coat a second-gen Mazda 3. With that in mind I bought a 50mL bottle to do the Highlander. I applied what I thought was a similar amount to the applicator as the previous application, but this time I only used about 15mL`s to do the entire SUV! I`d bet I can do my other two cars with what is left over...and maybe a set of wheels.
- Appearance and performance-wise, 3.0 is another home run like 2.0. The Highlander looks fantastic and after a good hard rain last night the vehicle is perfectly clean and the water is beading up really tight. I have no doubts it will hold up as well as 2.0.
Overall, I`m really pleased. Good thing because I now have to figure out how to use up another 30mL`s of the stuff before it goes bad!