Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wfedwar said:I have AJT, but haven't tried AJ. Any reason to use both? Does AJT just replace AJ?
(AJ=Jeff's Werkstat Acrylic Jett and AJT=""-trigger, the spray version)
For a while now, we've been wanting to advance our famous Acrylic Jett formula in an even easier, more sprayable direction. It sounds simple, but to do so while maintaining the same high concentration of active ingredients was a challenge that required re-assessing the specific blend of polymers. Instead of an obstacle, though, we took this as an opportunity to also explore ways to make the product even wetter and slicker.
This is the result: the 3rd Generation of our Acrylic Jett formula, which we affectionately call Trigger!
Like its fraternal twin--the original and much-loved Acrylic Jett--Trigger creates an exceptional wet gloss coating. Its purely protective formula allows easy layering over itself, over original A.Jett, or over Prime. The beauty of our acrylic polymer blend lies in its outstanding optical properties. The ultra smooth coating reflects low-angle incident light for crisp, clear reflections while the coating's high refractive index allows higher angle light to refract into the surface for improved depth of color. And, the light transmittance of acrylic polymers exceeds that of even optical glass, ensuring that the beauty of your paint will be revealed with unobstructed clarity.
wfedwar said:So AJ does seem to last longer? If that's true, it may be good to have both...
Rob Tomlin said:I guess that is possible. I have only used the AJT, with satisfactory, but not superb results. Perhaps the original AJ would have been better?
wfedwar said:What wasn't superb? Look, durability? Thanks,
Billy
Scottwax said:AJ seems a bit more durable and definitely more cost effective if you do a lot of cars with it. You tend to use more AJT to cover a car simply due to the application method. If you use AJ, just make sure you knock down any high spots with your foam hand applicator (do not attempt to machine apply it unless you hate yourself) before either wiping off the excess, or moving on to the next panel.
Scottwax said:AJ seems a bit more durable and definitely more cost effective if you do a lot of cars with it. You tend to use more AJT to cover a car simply due to the application method. If you use AJ, just make sure you knock down any high spots with your foam hand applicator (do not attempt to machine apply it unless you hate yourself) before either wiping off the excess, or moving on to the next panel.