Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FWIW, It would seem that you are looking at the cleaners in the 303 product line. Hopefully you were wanting a cleaner and not their protectant.HondaMan said:All these 303 formulas -- I hope I ordered the right one. One said it's pure (dilute it 10:1 or more) another was for general lifting of stuff, etc.
I got the general 303 one.
Our Pontiac has coated leather and I alternate between 4 Star Leather Conditioner and 303 Aerospace Protecant.newguy said:do any of you guys/gals use 303 on leather? would i be better off using Meg. gold class leather conditioner? also, can meg. leather conditioner be used on a reg. vinyl dashboard and trim?
CharlesW said:Anyway, Woolite & water, 6:1 seems to work good for cleaning. It also makes the cleaning solution pretty economical, a plus for a pro.
The rest of my routine may not be as practical because of the time involved.
Weekly
1. I wipe the entire seat with the Woolite/water solution which includes the leather and the vinyl areas. I really don't know on the Pontiac what is leather and what is vinyl.
2. I wipe the same entire area with a cloth dampened with just water and wipe it dry to remove any soap residue from the Woolite mixture.
3. I then apply 303 to the entire seat and buff it off thoroughly.
Once a month
I do steps 1 and 2, but for the 3rd step, I apply 4 Star Leather Conditioner to all of the front side of the seat. Some of that area is leather, some is vinyl. I put it on all of it.
Seems to be working for me. The seats in the GTP still look new, including the side bolsters. The car is about 57 months old with 43,000 miles on it. It is driven everyday, just not a long distance.
You could be 100% right, but if the leather conditioners were all that bad for coated leather, wouldn't at least one of the manufacturers mention that their product should not be used on coated leather? To the best of my knowledge, none make that distinction.Anthony A said:According to 303 the coating on the coated leather seats is actually vinyl. Using a leather conditioner on vinyl is not good for it. The conditioners can't penetrate the vinyl to get to the leather so it does no good for the leather. The leather conditoners are filled with oils that are harmful to the vinyl top coat. I have yet to hear a good explanation of how leather coated with vinyl can benefit from a leather conditioner that can't penetrate the vinyl to get to the leather in the first place. Even so I continue to hear people recommend to use leather conditioner on coated leather. Makes no sense to me.
CharlesW said:You could be 100% right, but if the leather conditioners were all that bad for coated leather, wouldn't at least one of the manufacturers mention that their product should not be used on coated leather? To the best of my knowledge, none make that distinction.
Don't many of the vehicles with non-coated leather still use vinyl in quite a few areas, backs, skirts,etc. :dunno
Anyway, it seems to be working for me and while I'm not necessarily recommending leather conditioner for vinyl, I would like to hear from a manufacturer of a leather conditioner that using it on vinyl is detrimental to the vinyl. Until then, I think I will probably continue with my present routine. An interior that still looks new at about 58 months and 44,000 miles makes me think it's not all bad.
Interesting discussion. Any more thoughts/comments?
Charles
JaredPointer said:[sarcastic] If it has a clearcoat, we shouldn't have to do anything to it, right? The clearcoat is the protection. That's the same thing that's over our paint...............[/sarcastic]
III said:Another user of 303 on leather here. As far as using leather conditioners on vinyl this is a new one for me. I'm not saying this info is wrong, I just never heard it before.
I remember one of the sales reps from meguiar's saying their leather cleaner/conditioner could be used on leather or vinyl. Who knows though. As far as two sites claiming the same info, (303 & cma) maybe one of them copied/shared the info from/to the other person?
Anthony A said:Who said anything about leather having clear coat on it? I said coated leather and the top coat is a vinyl product. This is in no way the same things as the clear coat on paint.
laefd said:Direct from the 303 website:
What does 303 Aerospace Protectant do for leather?
303 Aerospace Protectant™ works on Finished Leather. "Finished Leather" is dyed the desired color and finished so it does not readily absorb water or other liquids. Auto upholstery and furniture are almost always finished leather.
303 Aerospace Protectant should not be used on absorbent leathers.
What are absorbent leathers?
Absorbent leathers include deerskin, suede, chamois and the like. To test if a leather is absorbent: if a drop of water soaks in and makes a dark spot, it's absorbent leather and 303 Protectant is NOT recommended!
303 Aerospace Protectant™ softens hardening leather and leaves a natural, lustrous, repellent, non-oily finish. Similar to vinyl, finished leather is degraded by sweat, body oils, suntan and other oils & lotions. (Two extreme examples of this are tack (horse leathers) and exercise equipment.
303 Aerospace Protectant super-repellent finish is crucial when it comes to finished leather. Besides protecting against sweat, body oils and lotions, 303'd leather is almost impervious to water & oil based staining agents.
The major benefit is UV screening. 303 is the most powerful UV screening formulation is very effective on the dyes used in finished leather.
303 and Anthony make for a pretty good case that the conditioners may not be the right product for use on the majority of the "leather" out there, but I admit I'm a user and seemingly get very good results. Seems we ought to be able to hear directly from some of the "Leather Conditioners", 4*, Megs, Zaino, wolfgang, pinnacle, etc.
JaredPointer said:Anthony, I was kidding, hence the [sarcastic] tag. It was a joke, and in no way was I taking a shot at you. I thought the joke sarcastic tag would have given it away, but......
In any case, I was not trying to demean your knowledge.![]()