Originally Posted by
rlmccarty2000
I had hoped this point would be made. QDs should have some sort of cleaning action/properties. Beadmaker and others that are marketed as “sealants” would not make suitable QDs for removing fingerprints or light dust.
Sure, they should but based on who’s definition? Most QDs speak of polymer technologies, water repellancy and adding additional protection whilst also cleaning dust and fingerprints.
Meguiars Ultimate Quik Detailer:
"Through the use of new Hydrophobic Polymer Technology, Meguiar’s has created a spray detailer that actually repels water, withstands multiple car washes, and adds additional protection to your finish. The gentle, high lubricity formula is safe on all paint types including the latest clear coats and can be used daily to remove loose contaminants, dust and grime to keep your car looking its absolute best."
Optimum Instant Detailer & Gloss Enhancer:
"Optimum Instant Detailer & Gloss Enhancer adds the most gloss and slickness to the paint finish. This water-based, environmentally friendly formula utilizes flouropolymers, which repel dust, dirt, and oil."
Duragloss 921:
"Duragloss Fast Clean & Shine not only removes dust and enhances shine but also bonds to polishes and waxes increasing durability.
This is an amazing formula that is will drastically enhance the gloss, depth and shine after polishing or waxing. It is designed to remove dust, residue and fingermarks leaving a brilliant shine. However it bonds with durable polishes and waxes increasing their durability and depth of gloss."
Beadmaker could quite easily have any of the above product descriptions.
It would be wise to personally try a product before you define it.
Bookmarks