Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like
    Starting to get back into the detailing thing (non-professional, meaning no clients), so it will be my collection and maybe a friend/neighbor here and there. I`m currently equipped with a PC and some Megs products (step 2 polish, no.26, nxt 2.0, clay, gold class wash, couple of 5.5 LC orange, couple of 6.5 white and gray LC), but not something that really has correction.



    I`m looking into taking advantage of AG`s MemDay special and wanted to order some new product.



    Is it really overkill to get both the Menz power twins (SIP/Nano) and Megs power twins (105/205)?



    Will the product degrade over time?



    After much reading, it looks like some products work better than others, depending on paint type, condition, etc. I`d be looking at detailing Vettes, Nissans, Hondas, Chryslers, Lexus, Toyota.



    I was specifically looking at the Menz 5.5 pad kit and then also purchasing Megs 105 and 205 with the order.



    :thx

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,995
    Post Thanks / Like
    slickwilly- While neither one would be a bad choice, I think that in your case I`d go with the M105/M205. For one thing, IMO they`ll be easier to get the hang of and will easily cover a wider range of applications. *BIG* emphasis on the ease-of-use though, I`m not in favor of telling typical enthusiast-type users that they need to "master" products.



    I *would* recommend 4" pads though, but if the 5.5" ones work for you (big "if" IMO) then OK.



    The shelf-life of products like these is almost infinite IME. Protect them from freezing and *really* high temps and you`ll be OK. I use lots of stuff that`s many years old, some of my products are from the 1980s (!) and they still work fine. I`ve stockpiled discontinued polishes/compounds that I like and I`m confident that they`ll stay good for a long, long time.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Chicago USA
    Posts
    1,884
    Post Thanks / Like
    First of all, I think you need to figure out what works for your car... for softer clear coats, M105 is too much in most cases, but it`s still good to have around... also for softer clears, M205 might be too abrasive to finish down well.



    I would suggest you go with what Accum said, and get the M105/M205 combo, but add to it 106ff/fa and/or FPII from Menzerna. These finish down better than anything I`ve tried (I have yet to try ultrafina, which people says is pretty much the best finishing polish) and not much in the Meg`s line up will compare.



    Other than that, you should be fine with 5.5" pads especially if most of your work will be maintenance polishes now and then on yours and a few other cars, meaning you don`t need many smaller pads for unexpected correction details... I would however get 1-2 4" orange pads just in case.



    Oh and I really wouldn`t consider SIP/106ff "power twins"... it`s a good combo for a 2-step but IMO doesn`t compare that well with M105/M205 or M95/M80 (which is what I use a lot) since M105 and M95 cut much better/more than SIP but finish out the same, if not better at times.



    Long story short, my suggestion is M105, M205, FPII with 2-4 white 5.5" LC pads, 1-3 orange 5.5", 1-2 black 5.5", 1-2 orange 4"...
    <p class="bbc_center">Ivan Rajic - LUSTR Auto Detail</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">(773) 715-4198</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">info@lustrdetail.com</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">www.LUSTRDetail.com
    Chicago, Illinois

    Â`</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">Recognized as One of the Top Nine Auto Detailers in the US by AutoWeek Magazine!!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,995
    Post Thanks / Like
    lecchilo- That`s a good point about M105 being a bit aggressive; it`s not something people need to/should reach for every time. Ditto for why something like FPII can be a better choice than M205 in some cases. From `vettes` to Toyotas is quite a wide range of clearcoats! Heh heh, there`s just no way to really simplify this stuff beyond a certain point, huh?



    One thing I will disagree with you about is the Menzerna 106FF. After the *VERY* weird, unexpected concealing it did on my Yukon (when ebpcivicsi used it), I would recommend that beginners use something else instead. I`ll skip rehashing the weirdness of what I experienced, but it`s sure not something I`d wish on anybody and I`m trying to keep this recommendation very user-friendly.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Chicago USA
    Posts
    1,884
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Accumulator
    lecchilo- That`s a good point about M105 being a bit aggressive; it`s not something people need to/should reach for every time. Ditto for why something like FPII can be a better choice than M205 in some cases. From `vettes` to Toyotas is quite a wide range of clearcoats! Heh heh, there`s just no way to really simplify this stuff beyond a certain point, huh?



    One thing I will disagree with you about is the Menzerna 106FF. After the *VERY* weird, unexpected concealing it did on my Yukon (when ebpcivicsi used it), I would recommend that beginners use something else instead. I`ll skip rehashing the weirdness of what I experienced, but it`s sure not something I`d wish on anybody and I`m trying to keep this recommendation very user-friendly.


    True... it`s a good polish but probably not very user friendly as it not only has potential at concealing but if you use too much you`ll be working it forever as well as have a hard time removing it. FPII is even finer and, IMO, easier to use.
    <p class="bbc_center">Ivan Rajic - LUSTR Auto Detail</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">(773) 715-4198</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">info@lustrdetail.com</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">www.LUSTRDetail.com
    Chicago, Illinois

    Â`</p>
    <p class="bbc_center">Recognized as One of the Top Nine Auto Detailers in the US by AutoWeek Magazine!!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks for the feedback guys. I took another look and will probably wait on the Menzerna SIP/Nano until I can get some more experience and practice, since it does use diminishing abrasives. I also took a look at my pads I have now and the 2 orange 5.5`s are flat and the 4 (2 each) white/gray 6.5`s are CCS.



    How does the following order look?



    1. Megs Swirl Free Kit (M105, M205, 2 MF towels, 2 Orange 5.5 CCS)

    2. 3 pack of White 5.5 CCS pads

    3. Menz PO87MC (Micro Polish)

    OR

    Menz PO85RD (Polish)

    4. Wolfgang DG Sealant 3.0



    So item #3, not sure which is better or should I say, not sure which one would be better for my situation.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5,167
    Post Thanks / Like
    well, to put it simple...my go to process for most cars I see goes like this:

    megs 105 via lc orange pads

    menzerna SIP via polishing pad

    menzerna FPII via finishing pad



    now obviously I would have to change things up depending the clear, the conditions, etc...like the porsche, sip, fpii, fpii - no 105 as it was going to be TOO aggressive as lechillo mentioned...

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    544
    Post Thanks / Like
    I was in your shoes at one point in time, I decided to go with the whole Menz line up, and I mean it all. from soap to all the polishs to FMJ. I have NO regrets. I am going to give 1z a shot though.
    Canfield

    03 Mini Cooper S- 900 Pure Silver

    97 BMW ///M3 309 Arctic Silver Metallic

    93 Mazda Rx-7 R1- J9 Competition Yellow Mica

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    193
    Post Thanks / Like
    FMJ isn`t made by Menzerna though, I wish they would come out with something similar.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,889
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by slickwilly
    Thanks for the feedback guys. I took another look and will probably wait on the Menzerna SIP/Nano until I can get some more experience and practice, since it does use diminishing abrasives. I also took a look at my pads I have now and the 2 orange 5.5`s are flat and the 4 (2 each) white/gray 6.5`s are CCS.



    How does the following order look?



    1. Megs Swirl Free Kit (M105, M205, 2 MF towels, 2 Orange 5.5 CCS)

    2. 3 pack of White 5.5 CCS pads

    3. Menz PO87MC (Micro Polish)

    OR

    Menz PO85RD (Polish)

    4. Wolfgang DG Sealant 3.0



    So item #3, not sure which is better or should I say, not sure which one would be better for my situation.
    87MC has a cut of 1 vrs. 85RD with a cut of 1.5. Your order looks good, but I would still add a couple of 4" orange pads for heavier correction.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,995
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by slickwilly
    How does the following order look?



    1. Megs Swirl Free Kit (M105, M205, 2 MF towels, 2 Orange 5.5 CCS)

    2. 3 pack of White 5.5 CCS pads

    3. Menz PO87MC (Micro Polish)

    OR

    Menz PO85RD (Polish)

    4. Wolfgang DG Sealant 3.0



    So item #3, not sure which is better or should I say, not sure which one would be better for my situation.


    I dunno which of the Menzernas you should go with...depends on the paints in question. But that PO87MC (which I really need to try some time) is, AFAIK, *SO* gentle that I really wonder if it might be gilding the lily at this point :think:



    As Legacy99 said, I`d get some more 4" orange pads. But then *I* would be getting almost all the pads in 4".



    Oh, on hard clear (maybe the Corvette?), I`ve been having very good results with 4" *wool* pads and M105 via PC. The wool pads in question are made by Edge for Cyclo. Just something to keep in mind if you find you need them.



    I wouldn`t get the Wolfgang sealant, but hey...I`ve never used it so that might be unfair. I get the feeling it`s not in the super-durable category (e.g., KSG and FK1000P) nor is it extra-special in any other way (e.g., UPP = slickness, BF= carnauba-like darkening). Eh...maybe I`m just being a wet blanket :nixweiss

  12. #12
    Bostonsfavson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    278
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by lecchilo
    True... it`s a good polish but probably not very user friendly as it not only has potential at concealing but if you use too much you`ll be working it forever as well as have a hard time removing it. FPII is even finer and, IMO, easier to use.


    I`d consider the 106s to be fairly user friendly. I agree, though, that FPII would *definitely* be the better choice for beginners. It breaks down faster and comes off easier. I also think that it finishes *slightly* better than 106, but not by much.
    Will

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    28
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks again for the feedback guys...I ended up just getting a bit of everything...:xyxthumbs



    What I`ve also decided to do is to visit the local junkyard and find some good candidates for correction and practice, learning the in`s and out`s of these products...which works best with what pads on which finishes, etc.



    Better to practice on some scrap panels than a buddy`s car...:bolt

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    544
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by dan46n2
    FMJ isn`t made by Menzerna though, I wish they would come out with something similar.


    I wonder who makes it then, it seems to be some decent stuff, I am giving Jeff`s Arcrilic Jett a go.
    Canfield

    03 Mini Cooper S- 900 Pure Silver

    97 BMW ///M3 309 Arctic Silver Metallic

    93 Mazda Rx-7 R1- J9 Competition Yellow Mica

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Menz & Megs Polishes
    By imported_DetailDan in forum Good Deals
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-19-2012, 08:46 PM
  2. Zaino Z-PC abrasiveness compared to Menz or Megs products?
    By tsantoro in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-01-2008, 08:26 AM
  3. Menz & Megs
    By mnguyen110 in forum Good Deals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-02-2007, 03:00 AM
  4. Megs #21 Vs Menz FMJ?
    By CamV6 in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-31-2007, 11:13 PM
  5. megs #66 vs. menz AJ
    By Envious Eric in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 07:08 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •