Let me know which you think looks better. Thanks
#1
https://www.autopia.org/forums/attac...id=33758&stc=1
#2
https://www.autopia.org/forums/attac...id=33759&stc=1
Printable View
Let me know which you think looks better. Thanks
#1
https://www.autopia.org/forums/attac...id=33758&stc=1
#2
https://www.autopia.org/forums/attac...id=33759&stc=1
1 looks more consistant. the lines on Auto Spa thin out same as the ones on the crown and the letters look like the same as imperial.
welcome to Autopia!
I like #1 as well for similar reasons but like the sizing on #2 as a more overall visual appeal.
At least you are only considering two. I recently went though a logo redesign and it was a fun yet frustrating process. Good luck.
100% agree with Brandt!Quote:
Originally Posted by 512detail
#1, for reasons above.
I vote for #1. It looks cleaner and more appealing visually.
keanul18- Welcome to Autopia!
One more vote for #1.
1 as o! More inclined focus on both words simultaneously, where as 2nd logo I`m only focused on top line.Quote:
Originally Posted by Accumulator
#1 is my choice also because it`s easier to read, especially if your going to logo your detailing vehicle imho.
#1 its nice an bold
I vote for #1.
Maybe look at the kerning a bit, like the spaces between "IM" and "AL". I like the "RI" which seems a ligature was used.
Looks pretty clean. Using "SPA" suggests that it`s upscale.
Welcome,
And #1 - it sort of visually states professionalism and perfection. Sort of what you`re trying to convey I`m betting.
# 1 hands down.
Agree with 1, the text suits alot more imo.
Again another vote for #1. It was a easy decision between the two.
#1
we never heard back from the OP...I wonder which one they went with
What about going with #1 but changing "Auto Spa" to a Sans Serif font?
Might be beneficial to your brand to incorporate a serif and a san serif into your logo and then carry those two fonts through everything you print.
e.g. on your business card: your name in the serif, your title in the san serif.
Just my 2 cents!
#1 is more of an eye catcher.
Second one is more subdued.