Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    125
    Post Thanks / Like
    I know it`s always best to start off at a low speed, like around 1000, but if the directions on the bottle say it could be run at 1800, or 2000, should I run at the recommended speed or keep it slow?



    I guess it has something to do with how...lubricated?...the product is?

  2. #2
    Pre Med Student NavindraLR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    1,083
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by mjpowers728
    I know it`s always best to start off at a low speed, like around 1000, but if the directions on the bottle say it could be run at 1800, or 2000, should I run at the recommended speed or keep it slow?



    I guess it has something to do with how...lubricated?...the product is?


    if you`re asking this it sounds like you`re new to a rotary, so i would recommend starting slow for safety, as well as to learn. The more and more you do it, the more comfortable you`ll become at using the rotary at higher speeds. It`s better to start off slow, than to go at it too fast and ruin the paint. You can always go forward, but not backwards.

  3. #3
    richy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Windsor, Ontario
    Posts
    659
    Post Thanks / Like
    Some of your compounds need a higher speed and the resultant heat to work effectively. You can still use it at a lower speed, it may take a little longer, that`s all. Always check the temperature often, and keep it moving, you`ll be fine. the heat can be your friend for corrections that are difficult.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    125
    Post Thanks / Like
    So using a "higher speed" compound at say 1400 or less would still produce the same end result....just have to buff it longer? Should I be concerned about the abrasives taking longer to break down? Not referring to swirl marks, but that the cut will be heavier for a longer period of time.



    And yes, I am new to this. But I am learning and greatly appreciate everyone`s help here.

  5. #5
    Just a regular guy Todd@RUPES's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Oviedo/Stuart Florida
    Posts
    15,278
    Post Thanks / Like
    I`m in the explaining mood...



    Heat is not necessary, and often times unwanted, as far as polishing goes. People on here speak about heat, like if they where to warm the abbrasives in an oven, the abbrasives will some how refine themselves.



    Heat is the obviously by product or reaction of friction caused between the polish, the pad, and the paint. You can some what gauge (very inaccurately) the amount of friction or "work" you are doing (paint removal) by the varing your RPM/Polish/Pad/Pressure. But no detailer I know puts his hand on the paint, accurately judges the the tempature of the paint, then factors in every variable (paint hardness, inital abbrasive aggressiveness x the rate the abbrasive breaks down, pad type, rpm, ect...) then computes this crazy equation in his head and gauges the amount of work he has done.



    I think the thought of putting heat into the polish to break it down came from an old bodyshop guy, teaching some young scribe to "Really put some heat into."



    As you already alluded, the rate which the abbrasive breaks down is a function of the make up of the abbrasive and the force/time which it is worked against the surface. The higher the RPM you use (increasing friction), the faster the abbrasive breaks down (thus reducing working time) but the increase in friction from the pad`s great velocity plus the larger, more aggressive abrasives(haven`t broken down yet, tends to make up in the reduction of time.



    Generally, for polishing (removing light scratches, swirls, and burnishing the finish) the best way many have found is to light work the polish into the surface with moderate RPM`s first (800-1000) for a couple passes to ensure a uniform paste of polish has been layed down on the paint. Then the RPM is brought up to speed to polish the paint quicker (the RPM you use is dependant on the amount of cut you want) until the polish is fully broken down) then often reduced and another pass or two is made to lightly burnish the surface and reduce hologramming (or negating it).



    Here is a video clip of my working 106ff polish. You can see I make one quick pass to work the polish in very quickly and ensure a uniform paste of polish is one the paint, then I jump the RPM up to around 1700 or so (which is an RPM I personally like to break this polish quickly while uniformly breaking down the abbrasives) until the polish has broken down, then I back the RPM off and make one more pass to at around 1000 RPM to refine the finish and make sure it is perfect.




 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Dumb Question!!
    By oaevo8u in forum Car Detailing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-12-2004, 11:18 PM
  2. dumb wax question
    By jason rawls in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-06-2004, 11:17 AM
  3. another dumb rotary question...
    By jamesp in forum Auto Detailing 101
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-16-2004, 05:40 PM
  4. dumb question
    By got_3.2? in forum Car Detailing
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-20-2004, 04:07 PM
  5. Dumb PC question
    By bigpoppa in forum Car Detailing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-17-2002, 03:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •