From my experiences it seems to me that the paint solvent I use does not remove as many oils as ISO 50/50, and that ISO 50/50 doesnt remove as much as straight 91% ISO.
From my experiences it seems to me that the paint solvent I use does not remove as many oils as ISO 50/50, and that ISO 50/50 doesnt remove as much as straight 91% ISO.
Originally Posted by D&D Auto Detail
And IME (not that I`ve ever used Ultrafina...), TOL`s PrepWash gets oils off a lot better than IPA.
Originally Posted by Accumulator
I`ve been wanting to order this, but I keep reading their dilution instructions disappeared off the bottles? Did the formulation change to your knowledge or do you have any insight why it`s now omitted?
Originally Posted by Mindflux
Over 2 years ago. Jet black 745. Finished with UF polish and pad via rotary. Foamed via lance with 3oz of Z7 carwash and the rest water in a 32oz bottle.
Looks like some parts of the gulf.
Bryan Burnworth - Atlanta Car Detailing - Peachstate Detail LLC
Selected as one of the top nine detailers in the US by Autoweek
Published in the 356 Registry
The only exclusive Opti-Coat Pro specialist in Atlanta
All PPF work done by the best in Atlanta Derek Johnson of Atlanta Protective Films
Follow Peachstate Detail LLC on Facebook here.
Originally Posted by gmblack3a
Yeah I couldn`t remember what car it was on and I wasn`t about to search everything you`ve ever posted :chuckle:
Originally Posted by RaskyR1
Originally Posted by David Fermani
Rasky did you think I made it up? David did say paint thinner. Doesn`t matter now because the herd is piling on and distorting like they have a tendency to do. Now paint thinner doesn`t mean paint thinner in the regular sense. Ha ha what a joke.
Originally Posted by gmblack3a
HMM looks like polish residue coming off the paint. Show me a polish that doesn`t leave residue behind.
Also you say you used Zaino car wash to wash that. Funny Zaino car wash is removing the residue/oils but paint thinner can`t according to Dave.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
Results are often dependent on experience. That is why we must strive to qualify people`s opinions on the Internet otherwise poor unsuspecting souls could read lines like "Ultrafina is milder then FPII" with out the prerequisite "I only polish my own cars with Ultrafina and a Porter Cable so I don`t have very much experience" they are mislead into weighing the worth of the opinion.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
It`s a good thing you didn`t start attacking those people who had different opinions of you then.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
The only point proven is how people will post opinions and defend them with out having the required experience to offer a very meaningful opinion, then change their opinion, yet not learn from their mistakes.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
If something works by your standards then nobody is trying to tell you that you are wrong for liking the way a product performs. The problem is when you are going make definitive statements about people being wrong because their opinion is different then yours. When you pass your opinion off as factual in light of evidence that you are wrong then I do feel you are being misleading because you are more interested in defending your opinion then having open discussions.
I work with Body Shops all day long. I have taught one particular 3M rep how to use his product and regularly talk with two others. I have detailed cars for over twenty years and even doing this part time I average at least one full paint correction per week. I have provided why my experience would disagree with your opinions. You have attacked me and my creditability.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
Well this has EVERYTHING to do with it. If your experience is limited to doing your own cars every once in a while with a DA and UltraFina, at least it qualifies your experience and adds allows people an accurate way to weigh the value of your opinion. I am not sure what you do for a full time job or what your area of expertise is but if you where an investment banker I wouldn`t question you on interest rates just because I once put some money in my bank account.
The problem is that you are not being objective towards your own lack of experience, but would rather defend an opinion you have. Of course using a PC gives you the benefit of eliminating holograms because of the random scratch pattern you create.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
Oils can cause unwanted filling.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
I am sure that you have applied castor oil with a high speed rotary to a freshly applied paint and tried to remove it with various solvents, prep solutions, and alcohol or have polished your own cars with a PC a couple times. One or the other?
Originally Posted by Anthony A
As long as it works for you and your experience then great. You have no idea what you are talking about as far as removing certain products from paint but you do polish your own cars on occasion with a PC. At least those who read this thread will have an accurate idea on to way your opinion and will find your arguments on this thread with other respected detailers who have tons of experience laughable.
Metro Detroit`s leader in cleaning, preserving & perfecting fine automobiles!
Lets assume UF fills and that the fillers are able to withstand multiple coats of paint thinner and the defects stay filled for months and even years. AWESOME. Miracle product. Many people polish yearly anyways. Think of how great that would be to be able to fill your defects for a year instead of removing clear. Especially great for people with old vehicles and want to keep the vehicle looking good but not thin their paint out. 3M has accomplished what no one else has. Most fillers last a very short time. 3M made this super filler and didn`t tell anybody. In fact they marketed it as a non filler. Ha ha OK.
Originally Posted by Anthony A
I`ve never seen any "polish residue" look anything like the oil slick posted above. :nixweiss
I`ve seen UF filling that was not apparent after multiple IPA wipedowns. This filling only became aparrent after sometime later and multiple washes... It`s use has a very limited scope
I can`t speak to paint thinner but I have no reason to think David Fermani would lie about this as he has nothing to gain....
www.deep-gloss.com
Deep Gloss Auto Salon / Fine Automobile Detailing - Metro Detroit`s Paint Correction Specialist
For Discriminating Automobile Enthusiasts Who Demand The Best
Originally Posted by David Fermani
The only point proven is how people will post opinions and defend them with out having the required experience to offer a very meaningful opinion, then change their opinion, yet not learn from their mistakes.
If something works by your standards then nobody is trying to tell you that you are wrong for liking the way a product performs. The problem is when you are going make definitive statements about people being wrong because their opinion is different then yours. When you pass your opinion off as factual in light of evidence that you are wrong then I do feel you are being misleading because you are more interested in defending your opinion then having open discussions.
I work with Body Shops all day long. I have taught one particular 3M rep how to use his product and regularly talk with two others. I have detailed cars for over twenty years and even doing this part time I average at least one full paint correction per week. I have provided why my experience would disagree with your opinions. You have attacked me and my creditability.
Well this has EVERYTHING to do with it. If your experience is limited to doing your own cars every once in a while with a DA and UltraFina, at least it qualifies your experience and adds allows people an accurate way to weigh the value of your opinion. I am not sure what you do for a full time job or what your area of expertise is but if you where an investment banker I wouldn`t question you on interest rates just because I once put some money in my bank account.
The problem is that you are not being objective towards your own lack of experience, but would rather defend an opinion you have. Of course using a PC gives you the benefit of eliminating holograms because of the random scratch pattern you create.
Oils can cause unwanted filling.
I am sure that you have applied castor oil with a high speed rotary to a freshly applied paint and tried to remove it with various solvents, prep solutions, and alcohol or have polished your own cars with a PC a couple times. One or the other?
As long as it works for you and your experience then great. You have no idea what you are talking about as far as removing certain products from paint but you do polish your own cars on occasion with a PC. At least those who read this thread will have an accurate idea on to way your opinion and will find your arguments on this thread with other respected detailers who have tons of experience laughable.
Originally Posted by David Fermani
That about sums it up.
Originally Posted by Mindflux
So if it`s not polish residue than you think it`s fillers? Fillers that Z7 is removing but paint thinner cant?
Originally Posted by MichaelM
You think UF has fillers that paint thinner doesn`t remove? Yes or no. I get tired of "me to" boys running their mouths. Anybody can make posts like that. Back up your mouth.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks