Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: Cyclo vs Flex

  1. #16

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like
    chefwong- As I noted on another thread, you can use M105 without being all that aggressive.



    And I find it easier to do "moderate but significant" correction with orange foam(and even yellow in some cases) than with PFW. The PFW seems to do aggressive work for me, period. Yeah, it`s often *safer* for that than orange foam, but I can`t dial it back a notch with the PFW.



    Quote Originally Posted by efnfast
    Btw, what speeds do you find yourself using? Is 2-3 to spread it in, then bump it up for 5-6 for the initial correction then back down to 2-3 after several passes for a final pass a good pattern?


    Noting that I haven`t used it all that much so far...I`ve just been running it at speed 5, varying pressure but not speed.

  2. #17

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,154
    Post Thanks / Like
    If you ever get a chance, watch Joe at Superior with 105 and a wool pad. He can work anything and make it swirl free. We leveled paint one day on a dirty black car. We used about 3 products with different pads and so forth. His side with 105 and a wool pad was cleaner and more clear than our side and he did it in about a minute!



    It`s worth the money to "Roll With Joe".



    Rob Regan

  3. #18

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    764
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by WCD
    If you ever get a chance, watch Joe at Superior with 105 and a wool pad. He can work anything and make it swirl free. We leveled paint one day on a dirty black car. We used about 3 products with different pads and so forth. His side with 105 and a wool pad was cleaner and more clear than our side and he did it in about a minute!



    It`s worth the money to "Roll With Joe".



    Rob Regan


    Don`t suppose he has any youtube videos?

  4. #19

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    363
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by chefwong

    Even MORE scarier, unless I`m noticing this, is that there seems to be alot more *newbee* posts with M105 and orange pads, which to me is downright scary...


    Beh, in about a 6 months, we`ll be getting alot of "My clearcoat just failed , what should I do??" posts. :nono

  5. #20

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Quebec Canada
    Posts
    260
    Post Thanks / Like
    Joe is an artist for sure, like watching Monet paint, a master at work. As far as the Flex goes save your money and buy a Dynabrade attachment for your rotary, way less expensive, and much less vibration, and infinitely more durable.
    At Your Service



    Yvan




  6. #21

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by GoudyL
    Beh, in about a 6 months, we`ll be getting alot of "My clearcoat just failed , what should I do??" posts. :nono


    IF they just correct it *once* then keep it nice they should be OK.



    I have vehicles that were *hammered* with aggressive products/approaches and they`re still fine years later.



    The big thing is that people can`t keep doing serious correction over and over.

  7. #22

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like
    reparebrise- I think about a Dynabrade now and then...not sure why I went with the Flex instead :think: I have more polishers than I need by far but I *would* like to do a side-by-side between the Dynabrade and the Flex.



    For some reason the Dyanbrade just *looks* like it wouldn`t be all that user-friendly. Wouldn`t surprise me if I were *completely* wrong about that...can`t always tell by looking.



    Heh heh, I`ll probably have the Dynabrade rattling around in my head for a while now

  8. #23

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    764
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Accumulator
    IF they just correct it *once* then keep it nice they should be OK.



    I have vehicles that were *hammered* with aggressive products/approaches and they`re still fine years later.



    The big thing is that people can`t keep doing serious correction over and over.




    How does one define "serious correction" though? Is an orange pad/SIP once a year serious or mild? Is it the amount of pressure one had to exert? The number of passes?

  9. #24

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by efnfast
    How does one define "serious correction" though? Is an orange pad/SIP once a year serious or mild? Is it the amount of pressure one had to exert? The number of passes?


    I`d go by the amount of clear removed. In the absence of an ETG, I`d judge that by how severe the marring is and how completely it`s removed.



    E.g., I can use orange/M105 on the Audis and my GMC without taking off an appreciable amount of clear (good thing as that GMC is almost at the point where I can`t correct it any more). For lighter marring I can use M105 with a softer pad. It *takes* something like that to remove even the lightest marring in a timely manner on those hard clearcoats, and M105 can behave rather gently depending on the pad/pressure you use with it.



    Now if I tried that on the MPV I`d run out of clear in a moment...that vehicle gets much milder treatment and if that eventually means I have to live with some marring, well...so be it (or knowing me I`ll have some more paintwork done...with lots of extra clear ).

  10. #25

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    764
    Post Thanks / Like
    Got my Flex today; I can see why people really like it so much.



    LEAGUES better than a cyclo for correction (although I think the cyclo is better for sealing/waxing).



    For correction I`m finding myself using SIP and an orange pad - spread it in at 2, several passes with medium pressure at 6, then back off to 5 for a few passes and finish at 3.



    Then go to 106 - spread at 2, several passes with minimal pressure at 6, then a few passes at 5, and finish at 3.



    Is the above `okay`? I`m finding decent results, but wanting to make certain I`m not wasting my time (I remember when I first got my cyclo, I thought I had to go orange/83, green/83, white/83, then orange/80, green/80, white/80, hehe, so I figured I`d make sure I`ve got the Flex basics down and not wasting unnecessary time somewhere!!!)

  11. #26

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    86,984
    Post Thanks / Like
    efnfast- Eh..if it`s working then it`s working



    I haven`t tried the "up and down the scale" thing with the Flex`s speed but I`m using different products.



    Oh, and I wonder if you`d find a light burnishing/jeweling via Cyclo to be a worthwhile final touch :think: I sorta prefer that over doing it all via Flex.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. flex or cyclo
    By spiros antoniou in forum Machine Polishing & Sanding
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-26-2010, 05:32 AM
  2. Cyclo > Flex ; + my Flex burnt my paint =(
    By efnfast in forum Machine Polishing & Sanding
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-29-2010, 10:21 AM
  3. Anyone go from the Cyclo to the Flex?
    By max080 in forum Paint Correction and Gloss Enhancement
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-29-2008, 06:59 PM
  4. Flex vs Cyclo?
    By runnerbl in forum Machine Polishing & Sanding
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-18-2008, 03:18 PM
  5. Whats the better Machine Flex Flex Tool XC 3401 VR OR Cyclo Polisher?
    By LanceM in forum Machine Polishing & Sanding
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-16-2007, 07:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •