Losing the way!

[JBM]

Ted isnt what he says he is, he is not going to do anything different then Bush or Obama.

In the feuding over their wives that erupted this week, Donald Trump threatened to “spill the beans” on Ted Cruz’s wife Heidi, and an aide for the billionaire businessman made good on that promise.
“Spilling the beans is quite simple when it comes to Heidi Cruz,” Trump spokeswoman Katrina Pierson told MSNBC’s Steve Kornacki on Friday.
“Her entire career has been spent working against everything Ted Cruz says that he stands for,” Pierson said, after running through a list of affiliations.
“She is a Bush operative; she worked for the architect of NAFTA, which has killed millions of jobs in this country; she was a member on the Council on Foreign Relations who — in Sen. Cruz’s own words, called a nest of snakes that seeks to undermine national sovereignty; and she’s been working for Goldman Sachs, the same global bank that Ted Cruz left off of his financial disclosure,” Pierson said.

How can you trust anyone like that. Not to mention the affair story is probably true.

[JBM]

Wanna talk about losing the way, I mean can we do any worse then a moron who thinks capitalism is the same as communism? Hilary, Bernie and probably Cruz will all push this agenda (21)

Obama in Argentina:

“So often in the past there has been a division between left and right, between capitalists and communists or socialists, and especially in the Americas, that’s been a big debate,” Obama said.

“Those are interesting intellectual arguments, but I think for your generation, you should be practical and just choose from what works. You don’t have to worry about whether it really fits into socialist theory or capitalist theory. You should just decide what works,” he added.

[Ronkh]

It is not often that the potential first lady shown naked on the cover of GQ.

Are you trying to make a point, or just a statement?

[House of Wax]

Are you trying to make a point, or just a statement?

I can`t quite figure out why anyone would care anyway.

[JSFM35X]

The biggest problem we have in his country is hat the person who would do the best job as president does not want the job. The media, social media and general public are too quick to pry into someone private life. I am so over any candidates personal issues. I am concerned with your political views and plans for this country.

We have a lot of fixing to do and it`s going to take a president that can surround himself with the right people, for each job that has a track record of success ( nobody is perfect) but someone that can get stuff done. I`d like a president who spends my tax money like its his and looks to give the people of the usa a good vAlue for what they pay for in taxes. I`d like the president to butt out of my healthcare it has only cost me more for less so far and focus on making America safer and stronger during his term. I`d like to see us lead the free world in a direction that hunts down terrorists wherever and who ever they are and remove them and their associates from the face of the earth. We can do it and I`d like to see it hAppen. I promise you if we don`t begin the stamping out process it will only get worse.

[House of Wax]

The biggest problem we have in his country is hat the person who would do the best job as president does not want the job. The media, social media and general public are too quick to pry into someone private life. I am so over any candidates personal issues. I am concerned with your political views and plans for this country.

We have a lot of fixing to do and it`s going to take a president that can surround himself with the right people, for each job that has a track record of success ( nobody is perfect) but someone that can get stuff done. I`d like a president who spends my tax money like its his and looks to give the people of the usa a good vAlue for what they pay for in taxes. I`d like the president to butt out of my healthcare it has only cost me more for less so far and focus on making America safer and stronger during his term. I`d like to see us lead the free world in a direction that hunts down terrorists wherever and who ever they are and remove them and their associates from the face of the earth. We can do it and I`d like to see it hAppen. I promise you if we don`t begin the stamping out process it will only get worse.

This X a million, well said

[Bunky]

We have a lot of fixing to do and it`s going to take a president that can surround himself with the right people, for each job that has a track record of success ( nobody is perfect) but someone that can get stuff done.

The problem is this is not how our legislative process is designed to work. President Obama won twice (so much for a mandate), he proposed budgets, and Congress mostly ignored them after the GOP took over the House. Per the Origination Clause in the Constitution, the House (so Boehner was the leader over the last years) initiates spending bills. Now Paul Ryan has that role. Under Boehner, bills usually do not make it easily to the floor without the speaker`s consent so that is why we do not have an immigration bill, balanced budget bill where they identify what they will cut, etc but plenty of bills to get rid of Obamacare.

If the House leader, Senate leader, and the President are not working together, it is what we have today. There is fault on both sides.

This is why I think Newt`s Contract with America idea was interesting. They promised certain goals if elected and promptly voted for a number of them. In today`s process, no elected person is obligated to vote for anything. That is why everyone can promise anything.

[Old Pirate]

Bring Ronny Back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[allenk4]

Bunky,

Those Sound Bites are interesting, but have little to do with the real world that our current over regulated Nanny State requires businesses operate in

[Ronkh]

Unpassed budgets brought to us by the person who promised us lower insurance premiums... and that I could keep my policy and doctor...

[Ronkh]

Here ya go al. Use this one

[JSFM35X]

Al if we had a president he`ll bent on stamping out terrorism and the bill or motion was delayed of filabistrred we deserve to riot on the streets. I bet it would not happen. We need to unite the country to work together on common interests and then the rest will follow.

I`m not politically savy enough to figure it out but in my own business we do a good job getting things accomplished because I clearly demonstrate how working together toward a common goal will enrich everyone. There is a way for that to happen in our government. There should be not free lunch. There wasn`t one until 8 years ago. Now there`s a segment that is upset they might lose it. Lower taxes are great but at what cost. What burns me up is paying through the nose and getting less in return.

The problem is this is not how our legislative process is designed to work. President Obama won twice (so much for a mandate), he proposed budgets, and Congress mostly ignored them after the GOP took over the House. Per the Origination Clause in the Constitution, the House (so Boehner was the leader over the last years) initiates spending bills. Now Paul Ryan has that role. Under Boehner, bills usually do not make it easily to the floor without the speaker`s consent so that is why we do not have an immigration bill, balanced budget bill where they identify what they will cut, etc but plenty of bills to get rid of Obamacare.

If the House leader, Senate leader, and the President are not working together, it is what we have today. There is fault on both sides.

This is why I think Newt`s Contract with America idea was interesting. They promised certain goals if elected and promptly voted for a number of them. In today`s process, no elected person is obligated to vote for anything. That is why everyone can promise anything.

[Bunky]

I agree with some your frustration. you but there are too many political agendas in Congress for everyone to usually agree. They do agree when they agree to hate someone else. The problem is just not the supposed free loaders but corporate welfare (military is a large part of this).

For example, if the Republicans really had the answer they could pass a bill that addresses the budget despite the Democrat votes. If the Democrats had control of the House they could do the same thing. They are both dodging the issue although Dems are more willing to raise taxes.

This could be the election issue rather than all these vague promises on cutting taxes. The problem is they do not know how to cut $550 billion (every social program) to just BALANCE the budget without getting voted out of office. Even if you did this, taxes could still not go down without additional spending cuts. Also, the reality is if you took $500 billion out of the economy instantly you would see an instant recession.

[LEDetailng]

Here ya go al. Use this one

That is hilarious Ron

[Ronkh]

That is hilarious Ron

Had to give Al something better to work with.......