Trump 2016

[Ronkh]

New York Times don`t like The Donald very much.....................

Donald Trump Brings Theatrics to Iran Nuclear Deal Protest

[silverfox]

Trumps cabinet would include Phil Robertson of duck dynasty and Sarah Palin. This is really comical to see the clown show getting even crazier.

[Ronkh]

Trumps cabinet would include Phil Robertson of duck dynasty and Sarah Palin. This is really comical to see the clown show getting even crazier.

And his support growing....................

[silverfox]

Nobody is surprised. A door knob could win the next election as long as they aren`t an insider politician. That`s what the last 50 years has brought us to.

[Ronkh]

Nobody is surprised. A door knob could win the next election as long as they aren`t an insider politician. That`s what the last 50 years has brought us to.

Might be a good thing.

CHANGE & HOPE

[Dogfather]

A door knob wouldn`t have handed Iran the bomb.

[Ronkh]

A door knob wouldn`t have handed Iran the bomb.

Current events have proved that comment wrong...

[Swanicyouth]

Quite frankly, the way I feel about it, I`ll vote for Trump in a second. At least he has done *something* in this world successfully besides being a politician.

If we elect another career politician, whatever party - expect more of what has been going on for the past 70 years... Increased taxes for people who go to work everyday....Nit wits making an issue out of abortion.... Increasing entitlements for anyone happy living at the poverty level.

I`m not going to act like I`m super politically aware (I`m not), but I get the feeling working Americans will get more out of Trump than any career politician.

Kicking out illegals and building a wall is at least a step in the right direction, especially when the alternative is giving them drivers licenses and free medical care.

I would like The Donald to tell all the illegals and welfare recipients: "Your Fired".

[Bunky]

I would like The Donald to tell all the illegals and welfare recipients: "Your Fired".

I think the illegals are a red herring to dodge the more important fundamental issues. The best political tactic is to make you fear something and blame it on someone while distracting away from the real issues. We had crime and freeloaders from legal immigrants and citizens for years.

If we magically made all the illegals disappear, we would find they were contributing a lot to the economy. Even Donald admits we will let the good ones back. We cannot even get rid of the "bad" citizens.

As Obama has shown, the president actually cannot do that much without Congressional approval (despite complaints of his limited actions) and Donald will not get very far with the establishment republicans and democrats if elected. Ron Paul would have faced a similar fate despite making some feel good to make a statement.

The next president needs to be able to work deals in order to make any progress unless one party gets both the House and Senate (more than 60 seats). Otherwise, grid lock will continue.

[Ronkh]

As Obama has shown, the president actually cannot do that much without Congressional approval (despite complaints of his limited actions) .

The next president needs to be able to work deals in order to make any progress unless one party gets both the House and Senate (more than 60 seats). Otherwise, grid lock will continue.

I disagree here Al. Obama has done plenty without the benefit (read bypass) of Congress, AFTER he lost his "super majority"

Before someone says, "It`s nothing any other President has done....." I pose the following question.
Is the person who runs a stop sign just as guilty as someone who commits murder?

Answer: Yes, but the degree of the action is way different.

[Bunky]

I disagree here Al. Obama has done plenty without the benefit (read bypass) of Congress, AFTER he lost his "super majority"

Before someone says, "It`s nothing any other President has done....." I pose the following question.
Is the person who runs a stop sign just as guilty as someone who commits murder?

Answer: Yes, but the degree of the action is way different.

I agree that violating the laws is not right. There are always at least 3 sides: the lawyers for each side and the truth. For example, is deciding not to deport illegal? In this case, Congress could resolve much by just passing legislation to resolve it.

Net, take them to court.

[Ronkh]

I agree that violating the laws is not right. There are always at least 3 sides: the lawyers for each side and the truth. For example, is deciding not to deport illegal? In this case, Congress could resolve much by just passing legislation to resolve it.

Net, take them to court.

Over simplified statement. Still gotta get it to be signed by President.

[Bunky]

Over simplified statement. Still gotta get it to be signed by President.

If it can pass both the house and senate with the current make up, I think Obama would sign it.

If the Houses passes it I bet there will be enough Republicans in the Senate to override a veto since getting the House republicans to agree has been the issue. The Senate passed a bill that was too liberal for the House GOP. The sticking issue has been the path to citizenship and passing a bill to get it to a joint committee is something some on both sides may not want.

[Ronkh]

If it can pass both the house and senate with the current make up, I think Obama would sign it.

You mean like the iran nuke deal? The trade of 5 for bergdall (sp)

Or any of these listed or not listed (supposedly due to national security)


PPD 1 Organization of the National Security Council System 02/13/09
PPD 2 Implementation of the National Strategy for Countering Biological Threats (National Strategy) 11/23/09
PPD 3
PPD 4 National Space Policy (Fact Sheet) 06/29/10
PPD 5
PPD 6 Global Development (Fact Sheet) 09/22/10
PPD 7 National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) 01/26/11
PPD 8 National Preparedness 03/30/11
PPD 9
PPD 10 US Ballistic Missile Defenses
PPD 11 [terms of reference for Nuclear Posture Review implementation study]
PPD 12
PPD 13 Political and Economic Reform in the Middle East and North Africa
PPD 14 Procedures Implementing Section 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Fact Sheet) 02/28/12
PPD 15 Implementation of the Treaty on Open Skies 03/01/12
PPD 16 U.S. Strategy for Sub-Saharan Africa 06/14/12
PPD 17 Countering Improvised Explosive Devices
PPD 18 National Strategy for Maritime Security
PPD 19 Protecting Whistleblowers with Access to Classified Information 10/10/12
PPD 20 U.S. Cyber Operations Policy (Fact Sheet) 10/16/12
PPD 21 Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience 02/12/13
PPD 22
PPD 23 Security Sector Assistance (Fact Sheet) 04/05/13
PPD 24 [nuclear weapons employment guidance]
PPD 25
PPD 26
PPD 27 United States Conventional Arms Transfer Policy 01/15/14
PPD 28 Signals Intelligence Activities 01/17/14
PPD 29
PPD 30 U.S. Nationals Taken Hostage Abroad and Personnel Recovery Efforts 06/24/15




Or numerous laws that he chooses not to abide or circumvent............

[Anthony O.]

Ya`ll are seeing a problem and seeking a fix for it in the form of a bucket catching water from a dripping roof and not fixing the roof.

Politicians in and of themselves are not the problem but rather they system in which they operate. That is flawed. So instead of trying to fix the problems at the location of "D" and "E" which just adds more crap upon already dried crap we need to look at where the problem started, which is always "A". Find a solution to "A" and no longer will we need to place buckets under a leaking roof.

Can it be done? Sure. Will it be done? No! But why? Because the balance of power will be shifted from the "few" to the "People" and this can`t happen for in the eyes of the "few" they know what`s best for the People.

Look at how the branches of government was supposed to work and operate. It was a unique blend of checks and balances. A representative of the People would go and speak on their behalf their concerns, wants and needs. They would then return to their home and farm their land or continue their bakery, blacksmith, etc. They were NOT set in stone politicians we now see today.

We just recently had the Supreme court tell each individual state that under the Constitution xxxxsexuals are entitled to marriage equal as those of a heterosexual couple. Where does the Constitution say anything about marriage in the sense of it being equal? Yet it is now law and that law trumps any states Constitution.

Yet Federal law is always balked at with those seeking to protect "sanctuary cities" for illegal aliens. Marijuana is a illegal drug under federal law, yet states are making it legal? What in the hell is going on?

If a "LAW" is a law then it should be upheld yet those in power claim we need MORE laws to take care of the laws we have because more laws, more red tape, more power by the "few" is obviously what the People need. The People are just too stupid to grasp this concept.

How many people reading this have been busted for "contempt of court" and just walked away from it and had no penalty to pay at all? Well it`s because you are not power connected nor a politician.

So it matters not who gets voted in the sense of "fixing" the broken system because the "few" have a stranglehold on said system. Look at the corruption of Hillary and her clan and yet she still has a chance to become President!!

If the system worked as it should she would be shamed out of the public service area.

Is Trump a good choice? Maybe, considering we hired an asshat "community organizer" and kept him for 8 years....ya, Trump has a chance.

-Anthony