Leading The Way!

[House of Wax]

What difference does it make?


I`ll have to watch em later

[House of Wax]

I started watching the first one and had to stop.....just makes my blood boil

#1 because they were in that situation to begin with

#2 nothing was done once it hit the fan

And

#3 nobody will be held accountable for the colossal blunders

[Bunky]

I started watching the first one and had to stop.....just makes my blood boil
#3 nobody will be held accountable for the colossal blunders

Reagan was never held accountable for his blunders (Marines in Lebanon) and under GWB there were numerous attacks where people died plus 9/11 was not held accountable.

From the facts I have seen that even the "stand down crowd" agrees, the response took about 30 min to get going (so max 25 min delay). The CIA, not Hilliary, was calling the shots locally and the 2 SEALs died during the second attack after the rescue team arrived. Please note that the security team at the annex itself was thwarted. This complex was not a diplomatic office. Stevens was there for a meeting for other purposes.

I just do not see how this is Hilliary`s fault but then the motivation by some is not the truth. More hypocrisy.

[Ronkh]

Reagan was never held accountable for his blunders (Marines in Lebanon) and under GWB there were numerous attacks where people died plus 9/11 was not held accountable.

Deflect much?

[House of Wax]

Seriously.....

[Bunky]

If someone was only interested in the truth.

[Ronkh]

If someone was only interested in the truth.

IMHO, it sounds as though truth is only convenient if it follows your agenda.......

[House of Wax]

Hillary Clinton`s 5 Biggest Lies in Her Benghazi Testimony - Breitbart

I have as much issue with stuff liken this as I do with how she acted leading up to it. But I guess I need to keep in mind a Republican lied about something once to, so what difference does it make amirite

[House of Wax]

Republicans Aren`t Fighting Hillary, They`re Fighting the Hillary-Loving Media - Breitbart


Hillary Clinton is a red-hot garbage dumpster fire of a candidate.

On Monday, she barked like a dog to indict Republicans as liars. That was after labeling Republicans her “enemies,” stating that she will not release transcripts of her $700,000 speeches at Goldman Sachs, pretending she doesn’t know what it means to wipe a server, standing on her vagina to push her candidacy, and trotting out her lecherous old husband to recite talking points about her genius.

Clinton’sxspeeches sound like a mashup of John Edwards, HAL 9000, and the Wicked Witch of The West atop her broomstick. Every move she makes is transparently ridiculous – she virtually shouts “SUPPORT ME, BLACK PEOPLE!” every time she opens her mouth in order to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)from wrenching away the coveted Democratic nomination from her Gollum-like fingers.

Even her erstwhile allies recognize that Hillary’s awful. Saturday Night Live, a Hillary propaganda machine, now has Kate McKinnon as Hillary singing Bonnie Raitt’s I Can’t Make You Love Me to Bernie Sanders supporters. Democratic National Committee chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) couldn’t help laughing when Triumph The Insult Comic Dog insulted Hillary. Hillary has nothing going for her other than her last name.

Well, that and the media.

Because even though an occasional joke about Hillary will slip through the media machine, the vast majority of the time, the media prop Hillary up. That same Saturday Night Livexroutine mocking Hillary had characters talk about how she was the most qualified presidential candidate in history and how much they loved her foreign policy. Triumph spent more time insulting Bernie Sanders than Hillary. The media have spilled gallons of ink over the question of whether insulting Hillary’s shrill screeching is sexist or not; they’ve played defense for Hillary on matters of race; they’ve covered for her completely on her email scandal.

Which is why this seemingly ultra-beatable candidate actually looks relatively unbeatable in a general election. Professor Tim Groseclose of UCLA wrote back in 2011, “What if media bias were suddenly to disappear? In such a world, how would America look and act politically? The answer is, approximately like Texas. More specifically, if media bias were to disappear, according to the analysis, then America would think and vote like any region that voted around 56-43 percent for Republican Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) in the last presidential election.”

Media bias has gotten even worse since 2008. Obama’s election was a case study in media bias, with the media completely ignoring Obama’s radical associations, including his two-decade membership in a church run by overt racist Jeremiah Wright; 2012 reinforced Americans’ belief that the media desperately wanted a second Obama term.

Now, they’re turning their guns in favor of Hillary. John Dickerson, who just moderated the Republican debate on CBS News, told Hillary back in September that she had “been transparent in the release of these emails.” ABC Chief News Correspondent George Stephanopoulos literally wrote in his memoirs that he and Hillary exchanged declarations of love after Bill’s 1992 victory. PBS asked Hillary zero questions about her email scandal at last Thursday night’s debate with Sanders; Gwen Ifill did, however, ask Bernie Sanders if he would be “the instrument of thwarting history” if he prevented Hillary from becoming the first X-chromosomed president. CNN senior political analyst David Gergen – a former high-ranking Clinton staffer – said last week that there is no one “more experienced and more competent than Hillary.” After Hillary got crushed by Sanders in New Hampshire, Time magazine ran a cover with the quote, “I know what it’s like to be knocked down.”

No wonder Rasmussen found this week that 47 percent of Americans think media bias is the biggest problem in American politics, even more than the 45 percent who say money in politics is the problem. Americans should be evenxmorexskeptical of the media: they haven’t pulled out all the stops yet in favor of their girl.

That’s why analyses of particular Republican candidates’ electability usually overestimates support for well-spoken, non-offensive candidates like Mitt Romney, John McCain, and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL). Those analyses tend to ignore the fact that the media attack Republicans like rabid dogs in a general election. That means that whoever Republicans nominate had best be prepared for the tidal wave of media hatred that will wash over them.

[Accumulator]

Republicans Aren`t Fighting Hillary, They`re Fighting the Hillary-Loving Media - Breitbart..

Vitriol like that is counterproductive and will win Hillary votes. "..standing on her vagina" indeed. That writing is utterly juvenile, so Middle School...makes the writer sound moronic to me. No wonder my GOP is called the Stupid Party. If [individuals] like that would just *shut up* we`d have a better chance of winning the election. There`s no need for further preaching to the choir, it`s time to at least quit alienating anybody who`s still undecided (an endangered species that I suspect no longer exists).

[Ronkh]

[Ronkh]

[Ronkh]

First funny thing she said

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz8ZSf5vosI

[Bunky]

The Donald said he wanted to punch someone and someone accepted his offer. Donald ran away with the secret service.

The world is full of Donald Trumps but the sad part is that 30 to 40% of the republican voters want him to be president. This is why we should never take our freedoms for granted.

[silverfox]

The corruption and stagnation of both the democratic and republican parties created the environment for a Trump to rise. Both parties can pat themselves on the back if he`s elected.