Originally Posted by jfelbab
Yeah, I think that the more familiar one is with #16 the easier it is to work with. Might not be worth the learning curve to some people I suppose.
I *REALLY* find it to be special when applied via machine, that "paste wax that turns liquid" thing. Done right, with a pseudo-spitshine, I get tiny, perfectly spherical beads, like little ball bearings that`re barely in contact with the paint.
As to looks, #16 seems to be more like a sealant in it`s non-darkening, glossy appearance and it seems to make metallics pop. On darker colors I prefer a carnauba`s darkening glow but as with all waxes, much of their appeal is personal preference.
And I even prefer other LSPs on some *light* colors. But for a bright, clear, reflective look #16 is hard to beat. Sorta like P21s with better beading and durability.
About the only thing I didn`t like about the product is that if waxing a dark colored car with rock chips it tends to dry white in the chips.
Yeah, it can do that on the silver Audi too, especially if I get it on a bit thick. And note that I`m normally the last person in the world to be guilty of thick application of LSP
What is really hard to argue with is the economics of the product. I routinely get 80 applications from one tin. A tin costs around $13 so that equates to around $ 0.16 a pop.
Wonder how many applications I get from a tin :think: I do know that one tin always lasts me at least a decade, no matter how many vehicles I do with it.
Bookmarks